Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 12, 2019·TD Garden, Boston

Chicago Blackhawks 3, Boston Bruins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 76% of the time.

BOS winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI1716113326
BOS31411429637

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:22CHIAlex DeBrincatAssists: Dominik Kahun, Dylan Strome · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:47BOSDavid KrejciPPAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Jake DeBrusk · Snap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:36BOSDanton HeinenAssists: Brad Marchand, Zdeno Chara · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:59BOSBrad MarchandAssists: Danton Heinen, Patrice Bergeron · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–3
  5. P2 18:06BOSJake DeBruskGWGAssists: David Krejci, Brad Marchand · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–4
  6. P2 19:37CHIDuncan KeithAssists: Connor Murphy, Dominik Kahun · Slap, 0.02 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:48CHIErik GustafssonAssists: Duncan Keith, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–4
  8. P3 7:18BOSPeter CehlarikPPAssists: Danton Heinen, Torey Krug · Snap, 0.25 xG3–5
  9. P3 15:42BOSDavid KrejciAssists: Brad Marchand, Jake DeBrusk · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 7:12BOSBrad Marchand: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 8:23BOSZdeno Chara: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 13:43CHIBrent Seabrook: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 11:49CHIErik Gustafsson: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 15:42CHIConnor Murphy: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 16:02CHIJonathan Toews: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 1:16BOSSean Kuraly: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 3:53BOSNoel Acciari: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 3:53CHIJohn Hayden: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 5:42CHIDylan Strome: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIBOS
26Shots on goal37
2.0Expected goals3.6
44Shot attempts66
27Faceoffs won34
3Power plays5
12Penalty minutes8
18Hits26
12Blocked shots11
22Giveaways10
12Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestAnisimov – Saad – Sikura2:43

    xG 0.18–0.05 (80%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat5:54

    xG 0.34–0.30 (53%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Kruger – Hayden – Sikura2:12

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Toews – Saad – Caggiula3:32

    xG 0.14–0.23 (38%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook10:38

    xG 0.52–0.23 (69%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Keith – Murphy2:44

    xG 0.29–0.17 (63%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  3. Murphy – Forsling2:17

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestKrejci – Cehlarik – DeBrusk8:56

    xG 0.88–0.23 (80%)attempts 14–8goals 0–2

  2. Bergeron – Marchand – Heinen10:32

    xG 0.88–0.26 (78%)attempts 12–6goals 2–0

  3. Backes – Nordstrom – Frederic8:55

    xG 0.35–0.17 (68%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  4. Wagner – Kuraly – Acciari11:39

    xG 0.31–0.22 (59%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiller – Krug12:24

    xG 0.87–0.15 (86%)attempts 15–5goals 1–1

  2. Chara – McAvoy16:33

    xG 1.09–0.65 (63%)attempts 20–12goals 2–0

  3. Moore – Carlo11:28

    xG 0.52–0.23 (69%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.6 xGCHI 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #258 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.32 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 76% of the time.

BOS winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).