Tue, Feb 12, 2019·BB&T Center, Sunrise
Dallas Stars 3, Florida Panthers 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 74% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAL | 17 | 15 | 17 | 319 |
| FLA | 08 | 012 | 010 | 030 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 11:47DALTyler SeguinGWGAssists: Roope Hintz, Alexander Radulov · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–0
- P2 12:39DALEsa LindellAssists: Tyler Seguin, Jamie Benn · Snap, 0.22 xG2–0
- P3 17:48DALTyler SeguinENAssists: Alexander Radulov · Wrist, 0.49 xG3–0
Penalties (6)
- P1 18:33DALBrett Ritchie: Tripping2 min
- P2 7:41DALAlexander Radulov: Hooking2 min
- P2 9:52FLAMike Hoffman: Tripping2 min
- P2 13:51DALJamie Oleksiak: Interference2 min
- P3 5:12DALAndrew Cogliano: Slashing2 min
- P3 7:46FLAAaron Ekblad: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Trocheck won the faceoff against Dickinson
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Dallas Stars
Forward lines
- bestRadulov – Seguin – Hintz7:05
xG 0.61–0.02 (97%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0
- Radulov – Benn – Seguin6:58
xG 0.46–0.06 (88%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0
- Comeau – Benn – Dickinson5:44
xG 0.28–0.15 (65%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0
- Faksa – Janmark – Nichushkin4:54
xG 0.07–0.04 (63%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFedun – Heiskanen3:10
xG 0.56–0.02 (97%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
- Fedun – Oleksiak6:27
xG 0.71–0.19 (79%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0
- Klingberg – Heiskanen4:46
xG 0.49–0.07 (87%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0
Florida Panthers
Forward lines
- bestTrocheck – Huberdeau – Barkov3:53
xG 0.38–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0
- Trocheck – Huberdeau – Vatrano9:37
xG 0.37–0.38 (49%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0
- Dadonov – Hoffman – Barkov8:19
xG 0.10–0.15 (41%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0
- Brassard – Malgin – Borgstrom5:27
xG 0.14–0.28 (34%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- Pysyk – Matheson12:09
xG 0.64–0.60 (52%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0
- Brown – Kiselevich12:21
xG 0.10–0.12 (44%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0
- Yandle – Ekblad17:54
xG 0.21–1.16 (16%)attempts 12–18goals 0–2
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 74% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (FLA − DAL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).