Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 15, 2019·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

New Jersey Devils 5, Minnesota Wild 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsNJD wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
NJD072132711528
MIN212290803432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:07MINBrad HuntPPAssists: Ryan Suter, Mikael Granlund · Backhand, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:55MINJoel Eriksson EkUnassisted · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:26NJDMarcus JohanssonUnassisted · Slap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:33MINNick SeelerAssists: Brad Hunt, Kyle Rau · Slap, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P2 7:19MINMikael GranlundAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Ryan Suter · Slap, 0.05 xG1–4
  6. P2 18:10NJDWill ButcherAssists: Nico Hischier, Jesper Bratt · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 8:16NJDKyle PalmieriPPAssists: Marcus Johansson, Jesper Bratt · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:15NJDBen LovejoyAssists: Kenny Agostino, Pavel Zacha · Slap, 0.02 xG4–4
  9. OT 3:19NJDNico HischierGWGAssists: Kyle Palmieri · Backhand, 0.17 xG5–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:38NJDDamon Severson: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 3:33MINZach Parise: Holding2 min
  3. P2 14:07MINCharlie Coyle: Holding2 min
  4. P2 0:00NJDDamon Severson: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 2:33MINNick Seeler: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 8:09MINJared Spurgeon: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NJD00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← NJD attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hischier won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NJDMIN
28Shots on goal32
1.7Expected goals2.5
57Shot attempts59
34Faceoffs won28
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
16Hits28
14Blocked shots17
8Giveaways10
5Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Bratt – Hischier9:40

    xG 0.36–0.28 (57%)attempts 8–11goals 2–0

  2. Agostino – Zacha – Anderson7:01

    xG 0.24–0.32 (43%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  3. Stafford – Gabriel – Rooney3:10

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

  4. Zajac – Palmieri – Wood7:32

    xG 0.06–0.28 (17%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGreene – Severson8:13

    xG 0.38–0.29 (56%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Greene – Mueller2:29

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–1

  3. Lovejoy – Butcher9:05

    xG 0.05–0.15 (26%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Zucker – Greenway10:21

    xG 0.35–0.21 (62%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  2. Foligno – Eriksson Ek – Kunin7:31

    xG 0.22–0.12 (64%)attempts 6–7goals 1–1

  3. Parise – Coyle – Granlund10:54

    xG 0.53–0.44 (55%)attempts 15–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPateryn – Brodin12:16

    xG 0.44–0.11 (80%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon10:56

    xG 0.63–0.43 (59%)attempts 18–10goals 1–1

  3. Bitetto – Seeler6:25

    xG 0.01–0.25 (5%)attempts 2–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.5 xGNJD 1.7 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNJD

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NJD. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #72 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.00 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
NJD 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsNJD wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NJD), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).