Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 19, 2019·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Buffalo Sabres 2, Florida Panthers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 58% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF06112116234
FLA012012417441

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:14BUFJack EichelPPAssists: Sam Reinhart, Jeff Skinner · Wrist, 0.26 xG1–0
  2. P3 3:07FLAJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Frank Vatrano, Aleksander Barkov · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P3 3:50FLAJayce HawrylukAssists: Vincent Trocheck, Evgenii Dadonov · Deflected, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P3 5:42FLAAleksander BarkovGWGAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Frank Vatrano · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:45FLAJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Aleksander Barkov · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–4
  6. P3 19:52BUFVladimir SobotkaAssists: Zemgus Girgensons, Johan Larsson · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 5:52BUFVladimir Sobotka: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 13:22BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 16:38FLAVincent Trocheck: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 4:35FLAFrank Vatrano: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 6:57BUFRasmus Dahlin: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 7:11FLAJoshua Brown: Illegal check to head2 min
  7. P3 10:24BUFJack Eichel: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 12:38FLAKeith Yandle: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFFLA
34Shots on goal41
2.7Expected goals3.2
59Shot attempts65
27Faceoffs won33
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
41Hits30
16Blocked shots15
19Giveaways26
12Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestRodrigues – Thompson – Smith7:15

    xG 0.45–0.26 (64%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Sobotka – Larsson – Girgensons9:46

    xG 0.25–0.22 (53%)attempts 4–10goals 1–0

  3. Sheary – Reinhart – Mittelstadt9:18

    xG 0.41–0.52 (44%)attempts 16–11goals 0–1

  4. Pominville – Skinner – Eichel10:15

    xG 0.14–0.92 (13%)attempts 10–13goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. Bogosian – Dahlin11:16

    xG 0.52–0.61 (46%)attempts 13–13goals 0–1

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen12:50

    xG 0.44–0.65 (41%)attempts 15–12goals 0–1

  3. Beaulieu – Pilut9:54

    xG 0.05–0.62 (8%)attempts 5–14goals 0–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestHuberdeau – Barkov – Vatrano10:50

    xG 1.19–0.10 (93%)attempts 16–7goals 3–0

  2. Dadonov – Trocheck – Hawryluk2:13

    xG 0.27–0.10 (73%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  3. Brassard – Hoffman – Sheahan3:07

    xG 0.26–0.16 (62%)attempts 3–2goals 0–1

  4. Dadonov – Hoffman – Trocheck7:37

    xG 0.23–0.20 (53%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – Ekblad5:59

    xG 0.48–0.11 (81%)attempts 7–8goals 2–0

  2. Yandle – Brown2:56

    xG 0.40–0.05 (88%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Pysyk – McCoshen3:47

    xG 0.37–0.13 (74%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 3.2 xGBUF 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLABUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 45/100 · #704 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.24 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 58% of the time.

FLA winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).