Sat, Feb 23, 2019·Nationwide Arena, Columbus
San Jose Sharks 0, Columbus Blue Jackets 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 66% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SJS | 09 | 09 | 08 | 026 |
| CBJ | 17 | 211 | 18 | 426 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 9:00CBJBoone JennerGWGAssists: Josh Anderson · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
- P2 0:59CBJMatt DucheneAssists: Cam Atkinson, Artemi Panarin · Backhand, 0.25 xG0–2
- P2 19:52CBJCam AtkinsonPPAssists: Matt Duchene, Zach Werenski · Backhand, 0.38 xG0–3
- P3 6:03CBJPierre-Luc DuboisAssists: Dean Kukan, Oliver Bjorkstrand · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–4
Penalties (4)
- P2 4:24SJSMarcus Sorensen: Interference2 min
- P2 10:51CBJZach Werenski: Interference2 min
- P2 14:48CBJZach Werenski: Holding2 min
- P2 19:29SJSMicheal Haley: Interference2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Pavelski won the faceoff against Duchene
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
San Jose Sharks
Forward lines
- bestHaley – Goodrow – Karlsson8:10
xG 0.49–0.04 (93%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0
- Pavelski – Couture – Meier11:46
xG 0.15–0.30 (33%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0
- Kane – Donskoi – Hertl11:25
xG 0.36–0.71 (34%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1
- Thornton – Sorensen – Labanc6:17
xG 0.01–0.50 (1%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestVlasic – Dillon3:15
xG 0.18–0.12 (61%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
- Vlasic – Braun4:31
xG 0.19–0.15 (55%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
- Vlasic – Karlsson5:50
xG 0.10–0.12 (46%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forward lines
- bestFoligno – Jenner – Anderson12:46
xG 0.74–0.42 (64%)attempts 17–11goals 1–0
- Atkinson – Duchene – Panarin14:27
xG 0.95–0.70 (58%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0
- Duclair – Bjorkstrand – Dubois6:47
xG 0.21–0.07 (74%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0
- Dubinsky – Nash – Robinson12:11
xG 0.38–0.25 (60%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSavard – Nutivaara16:30
xG 0.94–0.33 (74%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0
- Jones – Werenski17:00
xG 0.70–0.35 (67%)attempts 14–13goals 0–0
- Harrington – Kukan15:01
xG 0.62–0.40 (61%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 66% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CBJ − SJS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).