Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 26, 2019·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Buffalo Sabres 2, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 84% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF16116014236
PHI219111215545

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:48PHIOskar LindblomAssists: Travis Konecny, Nolan Patrick · Wrist, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:52PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Claude Giroux, Philippe Myers · Wrist, 0.32 xG0–2
  3. P1 12:08BUFJack EichelPPAssists: Jeff Skinner, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:13PHIJames van RiemsdykGWGAssists: Robert Hagg, Radko Gudas · Deflected, 0.12 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:53BUFCasey MittelstadtAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Conor Sheary · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–3
  6. P3 0:46PHITravis SanheimAssists: Sean Couturier, Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:05PHIClaude GirouxENAssists: Michael Raffl · Wrist, 0.61 xG2–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:36BUFJohan Larsson: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 4:27PHIRyan Hartman: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 4:27BUFZach Bogosian: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 4:27BUFZach Bogosian: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 11:39PHIScott Laughton: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P1 13:43PHIMichael Raffl: Tripping2 min
  7. P1 19:10PHINolan Patrick: Slashing2 min
  8. P1 19:10BUFRasmus Ristolainen: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 1:12PHITravis Konecny: Too many men on the ice2 min
  10. P2 19:39BUFJake McCabe: Interference2 min
  11. P2 19:39PHIRyan Hartman: Embellishment2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Larsson won the faceoff against Patrick
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPHI
36Shots on goal45
2.0Expected goals4.2
62Shot attempts70
21Faceoffs won32
3Power plays2
10Penalty minutes12
20Hits25
16Blocked shots17
9Giveaways13
7Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Sobotka – Wilson3:59

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Sheary – Rodrigues – Mittelstadt7:35

    xG 0.43–0.54 (44%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

  3. Skinner – Reinhart – Eichel10:42

    xG 0.46–0.60 (44%)attempts 6–16goals 0–0

  4. Okposo – Larsson – Girgensons10:45

    xG 0.20–0.79 (20%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Ristolainen – Montour2:46

    xG 0.06–0.01 (81%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Scandella – McCabe2:30

    xG 0.21–0.19 (52%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. McCabe – Ristolainen9:51

    xG 0.15–0.40 (28%)attempts 8–17goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Voracek – Couturier2:22

    xG 0.78–0.02 (98%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  2. Voracek – Couturier – Lindblom9:25

    xG 0.53–0.16 (77%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  3. Giroux – Raffl – Patrick2:08

    xG 0.17–0.13 (57%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Konecny – Patrick6:16

    xG 0.11–0.20 (35%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – Provorov15:05

    xG 1.57–0.48 (77%)attempts 29–12goals 1–0

  2. Gudas – Hagg11:33

    xG 0.53–0.21 (72%)attempts 12–14goals 1–0

  3. MacDonald – Gudas3:19

    xG 0.18–0.06 (74%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 4.2 xGBUF 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #602 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.11 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 84% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).