Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 27, 2019·Pepsi Center, Denver

Vancouver Canucks 2, Colorado Avalanche 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 58% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN1801219031232
COL217012012042345

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:19COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Sven Andrighetto, Colin Wilson · Slap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:13VANAntoine RousselAssists: Alex Biega, Brock Boeser · Slap, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:26COLMikko RantanenPPAssists: Gabriel Landeskog · Slap, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P3 16:58VANJosh LeivoAssists: Ryan Spooner, Alex Biega · Slap, 0.07 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. VAN Elias Pettersson stopped
  2. 2. COL Nathan MacKinnon stopped
  3. 3. VAN Brock Boeser scored
  4. 4. COL Gabriel Landeskog stopped
  5. 5. VAN Bo Horvat stopped
  6. 6. COL Mikko Rantanen scored
  7. 7. VAN Nikolay Goldobin stopped
  8. 8. COL J.T. Compher stopped
  9. 9. VAN Markus Granlund stopped
  10. 10. COL Derick Brassard stopped
  11. 11. VAN Ryan Spooner stopped
  12. 12. COL Carl Soderberg scored
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:11COLMikko Rantanen: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 5:45VANAshton Sautner: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 10:42COLNikita Zadorov: Cross checking2 min
  4. P1 15:01COLColin Wilson: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 17:17VANJay Beagle: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 4:27VANBen Hutton: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 16:11COLGabriel Landeskog: Boarding2 min
  8. P3 0:47COLErik Johnson: Tripping2 min
  9. OT 4:45VANTanner Pearson: Roughing2 min
  10. OT 4:45COLNathan MacKinnon: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horvat won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCOL
32Shots on goal45
2.4Expected goals2.8
60Shot attempts70
27Faceoffs won32
5Power plays3
8Penalty minutes12
18Hits12
17Blocked shots18
7Giveaways10
7Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSpooner – Leivo – Horvat6:41

    xG 0.38–0.23 (62%)attempts 10–8goals 1–1

  2. Goldobin – Boeser – Pettersson3:59

    xG 0.22–0.10 (69%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Roussel – Leivo – Horvat2:19

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Leivo – Horvat – Goldobin2:01

    xG 0.10–0.06 (62%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBiega – Hutton4:10

    xG 0.26–0.16 (63%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  2. Biega – Pouliot13:26

    xG 0.55–0.45 (55%)attempts 10–12goals 2–1

  3. Schenn – Sautner6:59

    xG 0.20–0.16 (55%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestKerfoot – MacKinnon – Rantanen8:15

    xG 0.31–0.02 (93%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0

  2. Brassard – MacKinnon – Rantanen2:36

    xG 0.10–0.02 (85%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen2:08

    xG 0.06–0.00 (96%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Soderberg – Brassard – Compher8:09

    xG 0.20–0.19 (52%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestNemeth – Zadorov12:00

    xG 0.48–0.20 (71%)attempts 16–11goals 0–0

  2. Barrie – Graves6:03

    xG 0.33–0.17 (66%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  3. Barrie – Zadorov2:53

    xG 0.06–0.05 (56%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.8 xGVAN 2.4 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #419 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.90 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 58% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).