Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 6, 2019·Honda Center, Anaheim

St. Louis Blues 5, Anaheim Ducks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 75% of the time.

ANA winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL213110210533
ANA1621318427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:28ANANick RitchieAssists: Troy Terry, Korbinian Holzer · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:03STLBrayden SchennPPAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Ryan O'Reilly · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:55STLRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Tyler Bozak, Alex Pietrangelo · Snap, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:53STLRobert ThomasPPAssists: Colton Parayko, Patrick Maroon · Snap, 0.14 xG3–1
  5. P2 15:39ANARickard RakellPPAssists: Troy Terry, Cam Fowler · Slap, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:51ANAJaycob MegnaAssists: Sam Steel, Jakob Silfverberg · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P3 5:07ANAAdam HenriqueAssists: Jaycob Megna, Troy Terry · Backhand, 0.19 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:56STLRobert ThomasAssists: Colton Parayko, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.27 xG4–4
  9. P3 19:08STLAlex PietrangeloGWGAssists: Brayden Schenn · Tip-in, 0.09 xG5–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 7:50ANAJaycob Megna: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:52ANAHampus Lindholm: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 16:29STLOskar Sundqvist: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 18:52STLBrayden Schenn: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 11:57ANAHampus Lindholm: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 14:43STLJoel Edmundson: Roughing2 min · PPG
  7. P2 18:24ANARyan Kesler: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 12:02STLJoel Edmundson: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 16:42ANASam Steel: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Steel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLANA
33Shots on goal27
4.4Expected goals2.7
60Shot attempts58
30Faceoffs won39
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
33Hits31
17Blocked shots11
18Giveaways13
10Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestMaroon – Bozak – Thomas11:08

    xG 0.65–0.20 (76%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1

  2. Steen – Schwartz – Sundqvist11:39

    xG 0.59–0.43 (58%)attempts 11–9goals 0–2

  3. O'Reilly – Schenn – Tarasenko12:48

    xG 0.67–0.58 (53%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  4. MacEachern – Barbashev – Blais6:07

    xG 0.25–0.33 (44%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Dunn12:28

    xG 0.99–0.33 (75%)attempts 19–6goals 0–1

  2. Bouwmeester – Parayko13:55

    xG 0.58–0.55 (51%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Edmundson – Parayko2:06

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Ritchie – Terry8:39

    xG 0.57–0.17 (77%)attempts 10–5goals 2–1

  2. Silfverberg – Rakell – Steel8:31

    xG 0.51–0.44 (53%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  3. Getzlaf – Perry – Roy10:05

    xG 0.31–0.37 (46%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  4. Kesler – Rowney – Jones7:49

    xG 0.16–0.26 (38%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Fowler – Larsson13:45

    xG 0.34–0.41 (45%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  2. Manson – Lindholm15:00

    xG 0.50–0.71 (41%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  3. Holzer – Megna11:31

    xG 0.66–0.90 (42%)attempts 11–15goals 3–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 2.7 xGSTL 4.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANASTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #32 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.76 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +48 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 75% of the time.

ANA winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).