Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 7, 2019·United Center, Chicago

Buffalo Sabres 4, Chicago Blackhawks 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 64% of the time.

CHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
BUF01431218051439
CHI216012210073545

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:01CHIDuncan KeithAssists: Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane · Backhand, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:26CHIArtem AnisimovAssists: Dominik Kahun, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:16BUFVladimir SobotkaAssists: Tage Thompson, Brandon Montour · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:39BUFBrandon MontourAssists: Scott Wilson, Zach Bogosian · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 6:45BUFZach BogosianSHAssists: Evan Rodrigues · Backhand, 0.23 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:48CHIArtem AnisimovUnassisted · Backhand, 0.20 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:20BUFKyle OkposoAssists: Evan Rodrigues, Conor Sheary · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–3
  8. P3 7:57CHIBrendan PerliniAssists: Jonathan Toews, Slater Koekkoek · Snap, 0.19 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. CHI Jonathan Toews scored
  2. 2. BUF Jack Eichel scored
  3. 3. CHI Patrick Kane scored
  4. 4. BUF Sam Reinhart stopped
  5. 5. CHI Alex DeBrincat scored
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 6:37BUFCasey Nelson: Holding2 min
  2. P1 13:43BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 18:30CHIDavid Kampf: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 5:19BUFBrandon Montour: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 11:40CHIJonathan Toews: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 13:48BUFCasey Mittelstadt: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 19:15BUFBrandon Montour: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCHI
39Shots on goal45
3.9Expected goals4.9
64Shot attempts69
32Faceoffs won29
2Power plays5
10Penalty minutes4
12Hits18
10Blocked shots19
5Giveaways14
9Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Sheary – Rodrigues10:09

    xG 0.36–0.06 (86%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  2. Pominville – Wilson – Mittelstadt6:52

    xG 0.37–0.38 (49%)attempts 10–5goals 1–1

  3. Skinner – Reinhart – Eichel14:02

    xG 0.73–0.86 (46%)attempts 16–14goals 0–0

  4. Sobotka – Girgensons – Thompson5:48

    xG 0.32–0.53 (38%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Montour14:16

    xG 0.93–0.83 (53%)attempts 23–11goals 2–2

  2. Nelson – Dahlin12:01

    xG 0.47–0.52 (47%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  3. Montour – Dahlin2:06

    xG 0.01–0.07 (8%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestPerlini – Strome – DeBrincat8:08

    xG 0.70–0.37 (66%)attempts 13–11goals 0–1

  2. Toews – Kane – Saad3:08

    xG 0.33–0.01 (96%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  3. Kunitz – Kruger – Kampf9:37

    xG 0.32–0.07 (83%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  4. Anisimov – Kane – Kahun8:36

    xG 0.57–0.67 (46%)attempts 6–15goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurphy – Dahlstrom16:57

    xG 0.85–0.14 (86%)attempts 20–10goals 1–0

  2. Keith – Seabrook10:02

    xG 0.79–0.71 (53%)attempts 10–15goals 2–1

  3. Seabrook – Koekkoek3:14

    xG 0.19–0.20 (49%)attempts 2–5goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 4.9 xGBUF 3.9 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #57 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.61 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 64% of the time.

CHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).