Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 25, 2019·Madison Square Garden, New York

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, New York Rangers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

NYR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT11331617536
NYR21608011235

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:25NYRBrendan LemieuxAssists: Pavel Buchnevich, Mika Zibanejad · Snap, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:15NYRVinni LettieriPPAssists: Tony DeAngelo, Filip Chytil · Slap, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:41PITNick BjugstadAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Dominik Simon · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:01PITJustin SchultzPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Phil Kessel · Slap, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 7:17PITMatt CullenGWGAssists: Garrett Wilson · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P2 13:12PITTeddy BluegerSHAssists: Bryan Rust, Marcus Pettersson · Backhand, 0.21 xG4–2
  7. P3 7:38PITTeddy BluegerAssists: Jared McCann, Phil Kessel · Deflected, 0.24 xG5–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 13:58PITMarcus Pettersson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 0:27NYRBrady Skjei: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 9:02PITJack Johnson: Holding2 min
  4. P2 11:54PITPatric Hornqvist: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 15:05NYRBrett Howden: Holding2 min
  6. P3 7:38NYRPavel Buchnevich: Delaying game bench2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zibanejad won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITNYR
36Shots on goal35
3.0Expected goals2.2
58Shot attempts58
27Faceoffs won24
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
24Hits26
12Blocked shots10
11Giveaways14
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – Blueger – McCann11:01

    xG 0.66–0.36 (65%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  2. Cullen – Wilson – Johnson4:41

    xG 0.32–0.07 (82%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  3. Hornqvist – Bjugstad – Simon11:39

    xG 0.35–0.24 (59%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel14:05

    xG 0.53–0.73 (42%)attempts 16–18goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Dumoulin2:29

    xG 0.41–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  2. Dumoulin – Trotman12:17

    xG 0.74–0.35 (68%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  3. Gudbranson – Pettersson15:53

    xG 0.63–0.66 (49%)attempts 12–20goals 2–0

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestZibanejad – Buchnevich – Lemieux11:12

    xG 0.67–0.33 (67%)attempts 17–9goals 1–0

  2. Strome – Vesey – Andersson5:45

    xG 0.20–0.27 (43%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Namestnikov – Lettieri – Chytil11:27

    xG 0.20–0.81 (20%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Skjei11:07

    xG 0.74–0.32 (70%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  2. Gilmour – DeAngelo2:38

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Claesson – DeAngelo12:29

    xG 0.67–1.00 (40%)attempts 16–14goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 2.2 xGPIT 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #392 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.26 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

NYR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).