Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 27, 2019·TD Garden, Boston

New York Rangers 3, Boston Bruins 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 63% of the time.

BOS winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NYR1100627323
BOS11319410632

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:48BOSDavid PastrnakPPAssists: Brad Marchand, Patrice Bergeron · Slap, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:29NYRMika ZibanejadPPAssists: Ryan Strome, Pavel Buchnevich · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:15BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: David Krejci, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P3 3:19BOSJake DeBruskAssists: David Pastrnak, David Krejci · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P3 5:43NYRRyan StromeAssists: Brett Howden, Brady Skjei · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–3
  6. P3 12:52BOSDavid PastrnakPPGWGAssists: Torey Krug, Brad Marchand · Slap, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 16:23BOSPatrice BergeronPPAssists: David Pastrnak, Brad Marchand · Deflected, 0.18 xG2–5
  8. P3 17:12BOSCharlie McAvoyPPAssists: Zdeno Chara, Charlie Coyle · Snap, 0.06 xG2–6
  9. P3 19:56NYRMika ZibanejadPPAssists: Vladislav Namestnikov, Tony DeAngelo · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–6
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 2:29NYRPavel Buchnevich: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:51BOSZdeno Chara: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:46NYRRyan Strome: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 13:12BOSDavid Pastrnak: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 15:58BOSCharlie McAvoy: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 18:29NYRLias Andersson: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 18:29BOSPatrice Bergeron: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 18:29NYRLias Andersson: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 12:38NYRRyan Strome: Holding2 min · PPG
  10. P3 15:03NYRVinni Lettieri: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  11. P3 15:34NYRBrendan Smith: High sticking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 18:10BOSDavid Backes: Roughing2 min · PPG
  13. P3 18:10NYRLias Andersson: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 18:10BOSDavid Backes: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
46% to win54% to win
← NYR attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zibanejad won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRBOS
23Shots on goal32
2.2Expected goals3.0
39Shot attempts52
31Faceoffs won29
4Power plays6
16Penalty minutes12
24Hits27
9Blocked shots9
12Giveaways10
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Vesey – Andersson6:34

    xG 0.43–0.07 (86%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Namestnikov – Lettieri – Chytil8:32

    xG 0.05–0.22 (18%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Zibanejad – Buchnevich – Lemieux10:45

    xG 0.05–0.38 (11%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClaesson – DeAngelo8:48

    xG 0.39–0.11 (78%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  2. Gilmour – DeAngelo2:04

    xG 0.02–0.02 (46%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Shattenkirk – Skjei9:11

    xG 0.04–0.19 (17%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestCoyle – Wagner – Heinen4:06

    xG 0.34–0.01 (96%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Backes – Nordstrom – Acciari8:51

    xG 0.20–0.02 (91%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Bergeron – Marchand – Heinen3:42

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Bergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak5:11

    xG 0.13–0.04 (77%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKampfer – Clifton9:39

    xG 0.40–0.17 (70%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  2. Chara – McAvoy12:45

    xG 0.59–0.44 (57%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  3. Chara – Carlo2:30

    xG 0.17–0.06 (73%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.0 xGNYR 2.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSNYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #427 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.25 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 63% of the time.

BOS winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).