Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 2, 2019·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Boston Bruins 6, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 53% of the time.

CBJ winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS21121324628
CBJ0809217234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:58BOSJake DeBruskAssists: David Krejci, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:27BOSMarcus JohanssonAssists: Charlie Coyle, Chris Wagner · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P2 15:14BOSBrad MarchandGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–0
  4. P2 16:00BOSJake DeBruskAssists: Karson Kuhlman, David Krejci · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–0
  5. P3 0:34BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Patrice Bergeron, Brad Marchand · Wrist, 0.02 xG5–0
  6. P3 5:51CBJOliver BjorkstrandPPAssists: Seth Jones, Josh Anderson · Slap, 0.05 xG5–1
  7. P3 9:14CBJMatt DuchenePPAssists: Artemi Panarin, Cam Atkinson · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–2
  8. P3 10:28BOSKarson KuhlmanAssists: Jake DeBrusk, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.13 xG6–2
Penalties (4)
  1. P2 9:59BOSKevan Miller: Boarding2 min
  2. P2 10:12CBJAlexander Wennberg: Tripping2 min
  3. P3 4:13BOSBrad Marchand: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P3 6:24BOSCharlie McAvoy: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← BOS attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubinsky won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSCBJ
28Shots on goal34
2.4Expected goals2.5
41Shot attempts65
30Faceoffs won35
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
17Hits22
17Blocked shots5
2Giveaways5
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestKrejci – DeBrusk – Kuhlman11:36

    xG 1.00–0.15 (87%)attempts 15–6goals 3–0

  2. Johansson – Coyle – Wagner12:51

    xG 0.25–0.31 (44%)attempts 5–16goals 1–0

  3. Backes – Nordstrom – Acciari9:17

    xG 0.07–0.34 (16%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Bergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak12:06

    xG 0.05–0.46 (9%)attempts 3–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKrug – Carlo12:55

    xG 0.66–0.20 (77%)attempts 11–9goals 2–0

  2. Grzelcyk – Carlo2:10

    xG 0.03–0.05 (37%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Chara – McAvoy16:43

    xG 0.67–0.84 (44%)attempts 14–19goals 2–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestDubinsky – Foligno – Nash12:54

    xG 0.45–0.17 (73%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  2. Dzingel – Anderson – Dubois11:44

    xG 0.32–0.14 (69%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  3. Jenner – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg10:08

    xG 0.65–0.49 (57%)attempts 15–6goals 0–2

  4. Atkinson – Duchene – Panarin12:58

    xG 0.52–0.37 (58%)attempts 15–7goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Werenski20:33

    xG 0.70–0.58 (55%)attempts 22–13goals 0–2

  2. Harrington – Kukan12:43

    xG 0.40–0.43 (48%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  3. Savard – Nutivaara17:15

    xG 0.48–0.76 (39%)attempts 15–12goals 0–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 2.5 xGBOS 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #499 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.59 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 53% of the time.

CBJ winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).