Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 3, 2019·United Center, Chicago

St. Louis Blues 3, Chicago Blackhawks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 56% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
STL07110222010340
CHI112113111021438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:26CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Patrick Kane, Drake Caggiula · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:26STLVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Brayden Schenn, Colton Parayko · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:20CHIArtem AnisimovAssists: Dominik Kahun, Brandon Saad · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P3 11:37CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Dylan Strome, Duncan Keith · Backhand, 0.15 xG1–3
  5. P3 12:23STLDavid PerronPPAssists: Alex Pietrangelo, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:21STLTyler BozakAssists: Patrick Maroon, Colton Parayko · Backhand, 0.19 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. CHI Jonathan Toews scored
  2. 2. STL Tyler Bozak stopped
  3. 3. CHI Patrick Kane stopped
  4. 4. STL Ryan O'Reilly stopped
  5. 5. CHI Alex DeBrincat stopped
  6. 6. STL Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 3:37CHIDennis Gilbert: Holding the stick2 min
  2. P2 2:56STLBrayden Schenn: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 17:09STLTyler Bozak: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 1:34CHIDominik Kahun: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 11:59CHIDylan Strome: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCHI
40Shots on goal38
4.2Expected goals3.8
65Shot attempts65
30Faceoffs won28
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
11Hits20
20Blocked shots16
3Giveaways12
11Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Schenn – Tarasenko13:13

    xG 1.24–0.67 (65%)attempts 19–17goals 1–1

  2. Maroon – Bozak – Thomas11:09

    xG 0.78–0.40 (66%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  3. Steen – Sanford – Barbashev7:48

    xG 0.31–0.30 (51%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Perron – Schwartz – Sundqvist12:52

    xG 0.30–0.69 (30%)attempts 11–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGunnarsson – Pietrangelo8:36

    xG 0.64–0.07 (91%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Gunnarsson – Bortuzzo6:50

    xG 0.39–0.17 (70%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Pietrangelo – Dunn8:24

    xG 0.83–0.65 (56%)attempts 9–12goals 0–1

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Kane – Caggiula12:59

    xG 0.49–0.32 (60%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1

  2. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat2:19

    xG 0.34–0.23 (60%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  3. Anisimov – Saad – Kahun11:15

    xG 0.65–0.56 (54%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0

  4. Kunitz – Kruger – Hayden5:42

    xG 0.16–0.40 (29%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurphy – Gilbert12:09

    xG 0.38–0.28 (58%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  2. Keith – Gustafsson20:07

    xG 1.00–1.02 (50%)attempts 25–22goals 1–1

  3. Seabrook – Dahlstrom13:59

    xG 0.73–1.23 (37%)attempts 17–15goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.8 xGSTL 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 88/100 · #167 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.24 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +49 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 56% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).