Thu, Apr 4, 2019·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville
Vancouver Canucks 2, Nashville Predators 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 57% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 216 | 08 | 08 | 232 |
| NSH | 09 | 112 | 212 | 333 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 8:49VANMarkus GranlundPPAssists: Quinn Hughes, Tanner Pearson · Backhand, 0.18 xG1–0
- P1 19:48VANTanner PearsonPPAssists: Quinn Hughes, Ryan Spooner · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–0
- P2 0:37NSHColton SissonsAssists: Nick Bonino, Austin Watson · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
- P3 15:40NSHNick BoninoAssists: Austin Watson, Ryan Ellis · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–2
- P3 19:39NSHRyan JohansenGWGAssists: Filip Forsberg · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–3
Penalties (4)
- P1 6:50NSHWayne Simmonds: Hooking2 min · PPG
- P1 17:59NSHKyle Turris: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
- P2 6:36VANQuinn Hughes: Hooking2 min
- P2 10:21VANElias Pettersson: Holding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Bonino won the faceoff against Horvat
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestEriksson – Pearson – Horvat9:47
xG 0.38–0.19 (67%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0
- Beagle – Granlund – Schaller6:13
xG 0.47–0.29 (61%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0
- Spooner – Horvat – Boeser2:51
xG 0.15–0.01 (94%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
- Spooner – Boeser – Pettersson4:27
xG 0.09–0.12 (42%)attempts 5–1goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestEdler – Rafferty2:36
xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0
- Hutton – Stecher2:58
xG 0.14–0.04 (77%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
- Schenn – Hughes9:45
xG 0.53–0.65 (45%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0
Nashville Predators
Forward lines
- bestBonino – Watson – Sissons12:18
xG 0.98–0.25 (80%)attempts 11–9goals 2–0
- Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson13:18
xG 0.76–0.54 (58%)attempts 15–7goals 1–0
- Turris – Smith – Granlund10:50
xG 0.46–0.37 (55%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0
- Boyle – Simmonds – Jarnkrok5:44
xG 0.20–0.38 (34%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSubban – Ekholm15:49
xG 1.21–0.33 (78%)attempts 22–9goals 2–0
- Josi – Ellis15:23
xG 0.87–0.59 (60%)attempts 11–15goals 1–0
- Hamhuis – Fabbro9:56
xG 0.59–0.46 (56%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 57% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NSH − VAN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).