Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 7, 2019·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Buffalo Sabres 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 79% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF06271500318
CBJ21401511411444

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:09CBJOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Seth Jones, Zach Werenski · Backhand, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:05CBJCam AtkinsonPPAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Pierre-Luc Dubois · Snap, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:32BUFMarcus JohanssonPPAssists: Colin Miller, Conor Sheary · Snap, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:58BUFJeff SkinnerUnassisted · Snap, 0.19 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:46CBJNick FolignoPPAssists: Emil Bemstrom, Alexandre Texier · Wrist, 0.32 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:46BUFVictor OlofssonPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Sam Reinhart · Slap, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:08CBJAlexandre TexierGWGAssists: Nick Foligno · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 7:26CBJDavid Savard: Holding2 min
  2. P1 18:56BUFHenri Jokiharju: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:37CBJCam Atkinson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 7:04CBJSonny Milano: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P2 8:14BUFRasmus Dahlin: Interference2 min
  6. P3 5:38BUFRasmus Dahlin: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P3 17:34CBJBoone Jenner: Delaying game face off violation2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Dubois
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCBJ
18Shots on goal44
1.6Expected goals3.2
50Shot attempts63
26Faceoffs won34
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
13Hits15
13Blocked shots17
8Giveaways5
4Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Larsson – Girgensons9:34

    xG 0.32–0.01 (96%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Reinhart – Olofsson – Eichel15:11

    xG 0.36–0.41 (47%)attempts 11–16goals 0–1

  3. Sobotka – Johansson – Skinner10:09

    xG 0.27–0.40 (40%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

  4. Vesey – Sheary – Mittelstadt7:48

    xG 0.06–0.54 (11%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiller – Dahlin15:14

    xG 0.55–0.29 (65%)attempts 18–8goals 0–0

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen16:44

    xG 0.60–0.47 (56%)attempts 17–18goals 1–1

  3. Scandella – Jokiharju12:34

    xG 0.02–0.66 (2%)attempts 3–16goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestNash – Milano – Lilja5:45

    xG 0.35–0.22 (62%)attempts 6–2goals 0–1

  2. Nyquist – Atkinson – Dubois13:27

    xG 0.32–0.19 (63%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  3. Bjorkstrand – Wennberg – Texier12:14

    xG 0.30–0.18 (62%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  4. Foligno – Jenner – Bemstrom8:30

    xG 0.11–0.21 (35%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGavrikov – Nutivaara12:17

    xG 0.65–0.14 (82%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  2. Savard – Murray16:14

    xG 0.46–0.39 (54%)attempts 16–13goals 0–1

  3. Jones – Werenski17:22

    xG 0.36–0.47 (43%)attempts 14–14goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.2 xGBUF 1.6 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #108 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.30 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 79% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).