Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 19, 2019·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Buffalo Sabres 4, San Jose Sharks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

SJS winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF110111214435
SJS18011213332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:10BUFMarcus JohanssonAssists: Henri Jokiharju, Marco Scandella · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:00SJSTimo MeierPPAssists: Joe Thornton, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:03BUFCasey MittelstadtAssists: Henri Jokiharju, Jimmy Vesey · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P3 0:44SJSTomas HertlPPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Logan Couture · Deflected, 0.15 xG2–2
  5. P3 2:28BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Jake McCabe, Marcus Johansson · Deflected, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:50SJSMarcus SorensenAssists: Brent Burns · Tip-in, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 12:15BUFZemgus GirgensonsGWGAssists: Kyle Okposo, Johan Larsson · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 14:50BUFCasey Mittelstadt: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:20BUFJohan Larsson: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 3:09SJSKevin Labanc: Holding2 min
  4. P2 9:18SJSMario Ferraro: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 12:14BUFKyle Okposo: Holding2 min
  6. P2 18:52BUFRasmus Dahlin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 6:24SJSPatrick Marleau: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 13:41SJSBrenden Dillon: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFSJS
35Shots on goal32
3.5Expected goals3.0
51Shot attempts59
25Faceoffs won31
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
19Hits22
15Blocked shots9
7Giveaways6
8Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestSobotka – Johansson – Skinner10:37

    xG 0.94–0.62 (60%)attempts 12–12goals 2–0

  2. Okposo – Larsson – Girgensons6:43

    xG 0.56–0.41 (58%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  3. Reinhart – Olofsson – Eichel10:33

    xG 0.25–0.17 (60%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  4. Vesey – Sheary – Mittelstadt6:33

    xG 0.31–0.52 (37%)attempts 4–7goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcCabe – Ristolainen13:42

    xG 1.14–0.38 (75%)attempts 16–9goals 2–1

  2. Scandella – Jokiharju11:56

    xG 0.51–0.08 (86%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

  3. Miller – Dahlin12:12

    xG 0.16–0.73 (18%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Hertl – Labanc7:21

    xG 0.74–0.26 (74%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Karlsson – Gregor – Gambrell4:25

    xG 0.23–0.08 (74%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – Sorensen – Goodrow5:50

    xG 0.37–0.29 (56%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  4. Sorensen – Karlsson – Gambrell2:08

    xG 0.20–0.14 (59%)attempts 2–1goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Dillon13:32

    xG 1.33–0.95 (58%)attempts 18–13goals 0–2

  2. Burns – Karlsson2:25

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Burns – Ferraro2:19

    xG 0.22–0.15 (59%)attempts 3–1goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.0 xGBUF 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #117 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.42 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

SJS winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).