Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 24, 2019·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Anaheim Ducks 1, Dallas Stars 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 65% of the time.

DAL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA08111011130
DAL21001009229

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:42DALDenis GurianovAssists: Andrew Cogliano · Backhand, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:37DALDenis GurianovGWGAssists: Taylor Fedun, Jamie Oleksiak · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:31ANAMaxime ComtoisPPAssists: Nick Ritchie, Sam Steel · Snap, 0.39 xG1–2
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 8:32ANAJakob Silfverberg: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:19ANARickard Rakell: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 2:32DALAlexander Radulov: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 18:40DALJohn Klingberg: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
45% to win55% to win
← ANA attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Seguin won the faceoff against Henrique
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANADAL
30Shots on goal29
2.4Expected goals3.4
60Shot attempts54
27Faceoffs won37
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
13Hits21
16Blocked shots16
15Giveaways14
2Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestHenrique – Silfverberg – Jones2:32

    xG 0.12–0.02 (86%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Silfverberg – Ritchie2:16

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Getzlaf – Rakell – Ritchie3:22

    xG 0.02–0.03 (33%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Grant – Rowney – Jones6:34

    xG 0.26–0.30 (46%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolzer – Lindholm7:37

    xG 0.30–0.10 (74%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Fowler – Larsson6:50

    xG 0.12–0.18 (41%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

  3. Lindholm – Larsson2:32

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestPerry – Benn – Hintz12:24

    xG 0.85–0.26 (77%)attempts 10–15goals 0–0

  2. Cogliano – Dowling – Gurianov8:04

    xG 0.42–0.20 (68%)attempts 7–7goals 2–0

  3. Pavelski – Faksa – Dickinson4:33

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  4. Pavelski – Seguin – Dickinson5:41

    xG 0.16–0.17 (48%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlingberg – Heiskanen18:57

    xG 0.82–0.53 (61%)attempts 17–13goals 1–0

  2. Fedun – Oleksiak10:05

    xG 0.24–0.18 (57%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Sekera – Lindell13:39

    xG 0.22–0.34 (40%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 3.4 xGANA 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 12/100 · #968 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.83 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 65% of the time.

DAL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).