Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 27, 2019·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Florida Panthers 6, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 60% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA01031138629
EDM0709210226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:31FLAAaron EkbladAssists: Aleksander Barkov, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:58FLABrian BoylePPAssists: Brett Connolly, Jayce Hawryluk · Wrist, 0.33 xG2–0
  3. P2 2:36FLANoel AcciariGWGUnassisted · Snap, 0.17 xG3–0
  4. P3 0:49FLAEvgenii DadonovAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrap-around, 0.09 xG4–0
  5. P3 3:37EDMJames NealPPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Leon Draisaitl · Tip-in, 0.18 xG4–1
  6. P3 13:18EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Ethan Bear, Connor McDavid · Snap, 0.17 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:36FLAFrank VatranoENAssists: Denis Malgin, Mark Pysyk · Wrist, 0.63 xG5–2
  8. P3 19:40FLAJayce HawrylukAssists: Brett Connolly, Brian Boyle · Snap, 0.04 xG6–2
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 13:05FLAJayce Hawryluk: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 16:37EDMSam Gagner: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 6:49FLADryden Hunt: Interference2 min
  4. P3 2:16FLAMark Pysyk: Boarding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← FLA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Huberdeau
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAEDM
29Shots on goal26
2.9Expected goals3.6
50Shot attempts61
29Faceoffs won25
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
11Hits22
17Blocked shots13
12Giveaways13
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestHoffman – Vatrano – Malgin7:54

    xG 0.48–0.02 (96%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  2. Boyle – Connolly – Hawryluk6:41

    xG 0.37–0.15 (72%)attempts 3–7goals 2–0

  3. Hawryluk – Vatrano – Malgin2:32

    xG 0.13–0.01 (90%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  4. Boyle – Hoffman – Connolly2:52

    xG 0.11–0.16 (40%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Stralman – Pysyk15:54

    xG 0.83–0.79 (51%)attempts 14–18goals 1–0

  2. Yandle – Brown14:29

    xG 0.43–0.74 (37%)attempts 11–17goals 1–0

  3. Weegar – Ekblad17:04

    xG 0.35–0.92 (27%)attempts 14–8goals 1–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestKassian – Draisaitl – McDavid11:21

    xG 1.16–0.64 (64%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  2. Gagner – Sheahan – Jurco2:48

    xG 0.35–0.02 (94%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Neal – Kassian – Draisaitl2:23

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Chiasson – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid3:35

    xG 0.07–0.12 (37%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNurse – Bear17:49

    xG 1.11–0.54 (67%)attempts 17–11goals 1–3

  2. Russell – Klefbom18:35

    xG 0.92–0.46 (66%)attempts 17–20goals 0–0

  3. Klefbom – Benning2:19

    xG 0.01–0.04 (18%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.6 xGFLA 2.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 63/100 · #407 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.92 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 60% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).