Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 10, 2019·United Center, Chicago

Toronto Maple Leafs 4, Chicago Blackhawks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 55% of the time.

CHI winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR115016326457
CHI41201517534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:18CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Alex DeBrincat, Dylan Strome · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:00CHIKirby DachAssists: Andrew Shaw, Calvin de Haan · Slap, 0.36 xG0–2
  3. P1 12:10CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Alex DeBrincat, Dylan Strome · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P1 16:29TORWilliam NylanderAssists: Auston Matthews · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–3
  5. P1 17:28CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Alex DeBrincat, Patrick Kane · Snap, 0.28 xG1–4
  6. P3 2:27TORWilliam NylanderAssists: Auston Matthews · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P3 12:41TORJohn TavaresPPAssists: Auston Matthews · Wrist, 0.34 xG3–4
  8. P3 16:26CHIBrandon SaadGWGAssists: Jonathan Toews, Drake Caggiula · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:18TORAndreas JohnssonPPAssists: John Tavares, Auston Matthews · Snap, 0.15 xG4–5
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 0:32CHIJonathan Toews: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 0:32CHIJonathan Toews: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 0:32TORJake Muzzin: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 16:16TORJustin Holl: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P1 16:26CHIDylan Strome: Slashing2 min
  6. P1 17:17TORJake Muzzin: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 8:01TORMorgan Rielly: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 13:08TORCody Ceci: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 17:05CHIDylan Strome: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 3:55CHIAlex Nylander: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 5:04TORAuston Matthews: High sticking2 min
  12. P3 12:37CHIErik Gustafsson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  13. P3 18:23CHIZack Smith: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
45% to win55% to win
← TOR attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Matthews won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORCHI
57Shots on goal34
3.6Expected goals4.0
78Shot attempts55
32Faceoffs won35
5Power plays5
12Penalty minutes14
18Hits25
15Blocked shots13
5Giveaways8
8Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestJohnsson – Nylander – Matthews12:17

    xG 0.74–0.56 (57%)attempts 20–10goals 1–0

  2. Spezza – Kerfoot – Mikheyev2:43

    xG 0.11–0.10 (51%)attempts 5–4goals 0–2

  3. Spezza – Kapanen – Mikheyev2:29

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  4. Shore – Gauthier – Timashov2:44

    xG 0.01–0.11 (12%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBarrie – Ceci2:07

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Holl – Dermott6:29

    xG 0.18–0.09 (66%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  3. Rielly – Dermott3:00

    xG 0.02–0.14 (11%)attempts 3–2goals 0–1

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestShaw – Caggiula – Dach6:57

    xG 0.72–0.20 (79%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

  2. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat10:55

    xG 0.72–0.20 (78%)attempts 12–9goals 2–0

  3. Smith – Kubalik – Kampf5:54

    xG 0.30–0.29 (51%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  4. Toews – Saad – Nylander10:06

    xG 0.21–0.49 (30%)attempts 5–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – de Haan9:35

    xG 0.83–0.35 (70%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  2. Maatta – Boqvist10:02

    xG 0.58–0.12 (83%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

  3. Seabrook – Gustafsson3:54

    xG 0.46–0.11 (80%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 4.0 xGTOR 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHITOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #203 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 55% of the time.

CHI winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).