Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 14, 2019·Honda Center, Anaheim

San Jose Sharks 5, Anaheim Ducks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 60% of the time.

ANA winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS11119315535
ANA110111111332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:09ANARickard RakellAssists: Jakob Silfverberg · Snap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:44SJSTomas HertlAssists: Barclay Goodrow, Timo Meier · Tip-in, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:00ANAJakob SilfverbergPPAssists: Adam Henrique, Rickard Rakell · Tip-in, 0.32 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:28SJSTomas HertlAssists: Timo Meier, Brent Burns · Snap, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 8:05SJSBrent BurnsPPAssists: Evander Kane, Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 10:32SJSEvander KaneSHGWGAssists: Logan Couture · Tip-in, 0.36 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:50ANAMax JonesAssists: Carter Rowney, Sam Steel · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:21SJSLogan CoutureUnassisted · Snap, 0.10 xG5–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:36ANAErik Gudbranson: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 7:33SJSDalton Prout: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 7:33ANANicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 4:18SJSKevin Labanc: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 6:16SJSMelker Karlsson: Delaying game bench face off violation2 min
  6. P2 12:39SJSBrent Burns: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 13:56ANAMax Jones: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 6:42ANADerek Grant: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  9. P3 9:10SJSDalton Prout: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSANA
35Shots on goal32
3.8Expected goals4.5
63Shot attempts63
25Faceoffs won26
3Power plays4
13Penalty minutes11
18Hits18
11Blocked shots15
14Giveaways22
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestGoodrow – Hertl – Meier8:37

    xG 0.86–0.49 (64%)attempts 18–7goals 2–1

  2. Marleau – Couture – Kane4:31

    xG 0.42–0.11 (79%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  3. Thornton – Sorensen – Labanc3:07

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  4. Couture – Kane – Labanc7:23

    xG 0.26–0.19 (58%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Karlsson13:11

    xG 0.70–0.39 (64%)attempts 10–11goals 2–0

  2. Burns – Dillon3:55

    xG 0.46–0.18 (72%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Burns – Simek10:44

    xG 0.76–0.73 (51%)attempts 16–12goals 1–2

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGrant – Deslauriers – Rowney8:28

    xG 0.39–0.22 (64%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Ritchie – Kase8:03

    xG 0.27–0.22 (55%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

  3. Terry – Steel – Jones6:37

    xG 0.35–0.42 (45%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Henrique – Silfverberg – Rakell9:06

    xG 0.19–0.64 (23%)attempts 7–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudbranson – Mahura9:22

    xG 0.75–0.60 (56%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

  2. Gudbranson – Guhle3:08

    xG 0.03–0.08 (23%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Fowler – Larsson14:35

    xG 0.97–1.03 (48%)attempts 14–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 4.5 xGSJS 3.8 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANASJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #311 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.63 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 60% of the time.

ANA winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).