Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 17, 2019·United Center, Chicago

Buffalo Sabres 1, Chicago Blackhawks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 57% of the time.

CHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF013011110134
CHI11011027427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:43CHIKirby DachAssists: Dominik Kubalik, Andrew Shaw · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 12:32CHIKirby DachGWGAssists: Zack Smith, Olli Maatta · Backhand, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P3 3:42CHIPatrick KanePPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–3
  4. P3 8:57CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Brandon Saad, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–4
  5. P3 9:39BUFJack EichelUnassisted · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 11:59CHIAlex DeBrincat: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 16:40BUFJimmy Vesey: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 3:24BUFZemgus Girgensons: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 5:31CHIAndrew Shaw: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 9:25BUFBrandon Montour: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 14:01CHIErik Gustafsson: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 14:01BUFJimmy Vesey: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 17:04BUFRasmus Dahlin: Holding2 min
  9. P2 19:58CHIKirby Dach: Interference2 min
  10. P3 3:34BUFJake McCabe: High sticking2 min · PPG
  11. P3 10:04CHIOlli Maatta: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCHI
34Shots on goal27
2.9Expected goals3.3
58Shot attempts51
30Faceoffs won32
4Power plays5
15Penalty minutes13
41Hits33
8Blocked shots15
11Giveaways15
11Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestVesey – Lazar – Mittelstadt7:01

    xG 0.34–0.02 (94%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  2. Girgensons – Asplund – Thompson5:08

    xG 0.30–0.10 (74%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Skinner – Sheary – Rodrigues9:10

    xG 0.40–0.48 (45%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  4. Reinhart – Olofsson – Eichel12:14

    xG 0.42–0.77 (35%)attempts 9–14goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Jokiharju13:40

    xG 0.71–0.49 (59%)attempts 11–10goals 0–2

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen12:00

    xG 0.58–0.53 (53%)attempts 12–13goals 0–1

  3. Montour – Dahlin14:14

    xG 0.58–0.54 (52%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Saad – Nylander10:08

    xG 0.65–0.52 (56%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Shaw – Kubalik – Kampf6:43

    xG 0.31–0.28 (53%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Smith – Carpenter – Dach8:52

    xG 0.29–0.30 (49%)attempts 5–7goals 1–1

  4. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat10:22

    xG 0.16–0.77 (18%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurphy – Maatta11:40

    xG 0.53–0.30 (64%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  2. Seabrook – de Haan11:35

    xG 0.65–0.76 (46%)attempts 10–13goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Gustafsson12:00

    xG 0.31–0.58 (34%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.3 xGBUF 2.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 16/100 · #938 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.71 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 57% of the time.

CHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).