Mon, Nov 25, 2019·Honda Center, Anaheim
New York Islanders 0, Anaheim Ducks 3
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 57% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI | 016 | 07 | 03 | 026 |
| ANA | 05 | 116 | 23 | 324 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 10:26ANARyan GetzlafGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.23 xG0–1
- P3 13:13ANACam FowlerAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Troy Terry · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–2
- P3 14:24ANAOndrej KaseAssists: Erik Gudbranson, Cam Fowler · Snap, 0.02 xG0–3
Penalties (6)
- P1 9:38ANANick Ritchie: Holding2 min
- P1 15:35NYIScott Mayfield: Fighting5 min
- P1 15:35ANANicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
- P1 15:35ANANicolas Deslauriers: Roughing2 min
- P2 8:05NYIAnders Lee: Slashing2 min
- P3 6:23NYIJohnny Boychuk: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Cizikas won the faceoff against Grant
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
New York Islanders
Forward lines
- bestBrassard – Nelson – Beauvillier10:13
xG 0.25–0.17 (60%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0
- Bailey – Lee – Barzal2:20
xG 0.04–0.03 (57%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Clutterbuck – Martin – Cizikas8:31
xG 0.24–0.24 (50%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0
- Bailey – Johnston – Dal Colle6:10
xG 0.06–0.14 (32%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestMayfield – Toews11:19
xG 0.20–0.04 (83%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0
- Pelech – Pulock13:54
xG 0.46–0.46 (50%)attempts 17–10goals 0–1
- Boychuk – Leddy14:36
xG 0.61–1.07 (36%)attempts 20–18goals 0–1
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestGetzlaf – Rakell – Terry12:22
xG 0.87–0.24 (78%)attempts 11–12goals 2–0
- Grant – Deslauriers – Rowney9:38
xG 0.05–0.10 (33%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0
- Ritchie – Kase – Steel11:52
xG 0.23–0.34 (40%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0
- Henrique – Silfverberg – Jones9:25
xG 0.24–0.42 (36%)attempts 6–15goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFowler – Gudbranson18:45
xG 1.27–0.52 (71%)attempts 18–18goals 3–0
- Holzer – Guhle11:47
xG 0.13–0.22 (37%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0
- Gudbranson – Lindholm2:19
xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it NYI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 57% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ANA − NYI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).