Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 29, 2019·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 69% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT13016112231
CBJ11331116530

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:21CBJGustav NyquistAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand · Tip-in, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:57PITJake GuentzelAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Dominik Simon · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:26CBJNick FolignoUnassisted · Snap, 0.23 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:52CBJGustav NyquistPPGWGAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois, Zach Werenski · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P2 15:09CBJNick FolignoPPAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–4
  6. P3 5:20PITKris LetangAssists: Jake Guentzel, Evgeni Malkin · Slap, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:01CBJGustav NyquistENAssists: Josh Anderson, David Savard · Wrist, 0.68 xG2–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:30PITSam Lafferty: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 1:19PITDominik Kahun: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:06CBJJosh Anderson: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 14:45PITJake Guentzel: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 18:20CBJPierre-Luc Dubois: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 3:11PITAlex Galchenyuk: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 11:10CBJSonny Milano: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 16:50CBJGustav Nyquist: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCBJ
31Shots on goal30
2.6Expected goals3.8
53Shot attempts48
29Faceoffs won29
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
22Hits22
7Blocked shots16
7Giveaways8
8Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. Malkin – Guentzel – Simon13:29

    xG 0.73–0.77 (49%)attempts 17–9goals 2–2

  2. Blueger – Tanev – Aston-Reese7:12

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  3. Hornqvist – McCann – Kahun12:53

    xG 0.18–0.52 (25%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPettersson – Marino5:07

    xG 0.18–0.03 (88%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Trotman3:18

    xG 0.01–0.02 (38%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Trotman – Pettersson8:00

    xG 0.10–0.23 (31%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Atkinson – Wennberg8:10

    xG 0.65–0.12 (84%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Nash – Texier – Bemstrom7:15

    xG 0.45–0.05 (91%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Anderson – Milano – Dubois9:59

    xG 0.55–0.24 (70%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  4. Nyquist – Jenner – Bjorkstrand10:29

    xG 0.46–0.51 (48%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Werenski13:13

    xG 0.80–0.29 (74%)attempts 10–9goals 2–1

  2. Savard – Murray15:48

    xG 0.84–0.68 (55%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

  3. Kukan – Gavrikov14:28

    xG 0.38–0.23 (63%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.8 xGPIT 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #547 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.97 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 69% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).