Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 6, 2019·Prudential Center, Newark

Chicago Blackhawks 2, New Jersey Devils 1 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 69% of the time.

NJD winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CHI0711505023229
NJD11001206022130

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:31NJDTaylor HallAssists: Sami Vatanen, Nikita Gusev · Snap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 9:35CHIAlex DeBrincatAssists: Patrick Kane, Dylan Strome · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. CHI Jonathan Toews scored
  2. 2. NJD Nikita Gusev scored
  3. 3. CHI Patrick Kane scored
  4. 4. NJD Jesper Boqvist scored
  5. 5. CHI Alex DeBrincat stopped
  6. 6. NJD Kyle Palmieri stopped
  7. 7. CHI Dylan Strome stopped
  8. 8. NJD Taylor Hall stopped
  9. 9. CHI Kirby Dach scored
  10. 10. NJD Jack Hughes stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 1:19CHIAlex Nylander: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 4:21CHICalvin de Haan: Interference2 min
  3. P1 6:29CHIDennis Gilbert: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 6:29NJDWayne Simmonds: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 12:30CHIZack Smith: Elbowing2 min
  6. P2 8:19NJDSami Vatanen: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 4:01NJDKyle Palmieri: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 6:16CHIZack Smith: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NJD
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackNJD attack →
  1. P1 20:00Strome won the faceoff against Zajac
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINJD
29Shots on goal30
3.8Expected goals2.6
65Shot attempts61
26Faceoffs won29
2Power plays4
13Penalty minutes9
13Hits18
20Blocked shots20
8Giveaways13
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Saad – Nylander9:17

    xG 0.42–0.17 (72%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Kane – Strome – DeBrincat16:09

    xG 0.91–0.88 (51%)attempts 21–17goals 0–0

  3. Smith – Carpenter – Dach9:14

    xG 0.37–0.36 (51%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  4. Kubalik – Kampf – Wedin6:23

    xG 0.51–0.59 (46%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurphy – Koekkoek13:51

    xG 0.68–0.54 (56%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

  2. Seabrook – de Haan16:35

    xG 0.90–0.92 (50%)attempts 20–19goals 0–0

  3. Gustafsson – Gilbert11:33

    xG 0.19–0.36 (35%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestZajac – Coleman – Bratt3:58

    xG 0.44–0.19 (70%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Simmonds – Wood – Rooney6:00

    xG 0.32–0.37 (47%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Palmieri – Hall – Hughes9:49

    xG 0.34–0.51 (40%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  4. Zajac – Coleman – Gusev7:47

    xG 0.15–0.34 (31%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGreene – Severson4:51

    xG 0.44–0.27 (62%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Greene – Subban12:45

    xG 0.70–0.73 (49%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  3. Butcher – Mueller9:59

    xG 0.38–0.58 (40%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NJD 2.6 xGCHI 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NJDCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 55/100 · #508 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.68 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NJD 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 69% of the time.

NJD winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NJD − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).