Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 6, 2019·Honda Center, Anaheim

Washington Capitals 3, Anaheim Ducks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 69% of the time.

ANA winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH11211519336
ANA0141817229

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:00WSHTravis BoydAssists: Carl Hagelin, Dmitry Orlov · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:10WSHEvgeny KuznetsovPPAssists: John Carlson, Jakub Vrana · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P2 17:03ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Troy Terry · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P3 0:45ANAAdam HenriqueAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Ondrej Kase · Other, 1.00 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:37WSHJakub VranaGWGUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG3–2
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 18:08WSHCarl Hagelin: Interference2 min
  2. P2 2:12ANASam Steel: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 4:54ANAErik Gudbranson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  4. P2 4:54WSHGarnet Hathaway: Misconduct10 min
  5. P2 4:54ANAErik Gudbranson: Misconduct10 min
  6. P2 8:17WSHRadko Gudas: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 8:17ANANicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 8:17ANANicolas Deslauriers: Misconduct10 min
  9. P2 9:06ANACam Fowler: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 9:36WSHT.J. Oshie: Cross checking2 min
  11. P2 11:40WSHJonas Siegenthaler: Slashing2 min
  12. P3 3:06WSHGarnet Hathaway: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 3:06ANAErik Gudbranson: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 9:39WSHEvgeny Kuznetsov: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 9:39ANADerek Grant: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
45% to win55% to win
← WSH attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Henrique won the faceoff against Kuznetsov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHANA
36Shots on goal29
5.2Expected goals4.2
50Shot attempts69
19Faceoffs won34
3Power plays3
28Penalty minutes38
21Hits27
12Blocked shots5
11Giveaways11
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestOshie – Eller – Vrana11:00

    xG 0.67–0.28 (71%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Hagelin – Panik – Boyd8:18

    xG 0.34–0.13 (72%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  3. Dowd – Leipsic – Hathaway5:53

    xG 0.35–0.46 (43%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  4. Ovechkin – Kuznetsov – Wilson12:11

    xG 0.28–1.61 (15%)attempts 6–17goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Siegenthaler11:35

    xG 1.24–0.78 (61%)attempts 5–18goals 1–0

  2. Orlov – Jensen16:03

    xG 1.10–0.83 (57%)attempts 17–19goals 1–0

  3. Carlson – Kempny12:51

    xG 0.54–1.30 (29%)attempts 12–10goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSilfverberg – Rakell – Steel9:47

    xG 0.66–0.32 (67%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Henrique – Kase3:40

    xG 0.20–0.02 (93%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Ritchie – Kase4:04

    xG 0.17–0.06 (74%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  4. Grant – Deslauriers – Rowney5:15

    xG 0.28–0.25 (52%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Lindholm13:28

    xG 0.74–0.42 (64%)attempts 18–8goals 0–0

  2. Del Zotto – Fowler2:24

    xG 0.21–0.03 (88%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Gudbranson – Guhle2:02

    xG 0.20–0.20 (50%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 4.2 xGWSH 5.2 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 65/100 · #384 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.50 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Washington Capitals win this game 69% of the time.

ANA winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).