Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 8, 2019·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Buffalo Sabres 3, Edmonton Oilers 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 54% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF211040611322
EDM0102120600228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:08BUFKyle OkposoAssists: Marco Scandella · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:43BUFJohan LarssonAssists: Jimmy Vesey, Rasmus Asplund · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–0
  3. P2 8:25EDMRiley SheahanAssists: Joakim Nygard, Darnell Nurse · Backhand, 0.17 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:56EDMJoakim NygardPPAssists: Darnell Nurse, Gaetan Haas · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. OT 1:13BUFColin MillerGWGAssists: Marcus Johansson, Jack Eichel · Slap, 0.36 xG3–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:22BUFBrandon Montour: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 7:42EDMMarkus Granlund: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 15:26EDMConnor McDavid: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 5:40BUFZach Bogosian: Holding the stick2 min
  5. P2 13:57BUFZach Bogosian: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 17:31EDMJoel Persson: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFEDM
22Shots on goal28
2.8Expected goals2.6
53Shot attempts44
19Faceoffs won32
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
17Hits13
9Blocked shots15
14Giveaways23
4Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Larsson – Girgensons9:23

    xG 0.27–0.05 (85%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Vesey – Sheary – Rodrigues4:06

    xG 0.31–0.22 (59%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Reinhart – Olofsson – Eichel13:44

    xG 0.50–0.53 (49%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

  4. Johansson – Skinner – Asplund6:50

    xG 0.16–0.23 (42%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Jokiharju11:21

    xG 0.32–0.15 (68%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Ristolainen – Montour14:58

    xG 0.69–0.55 (56%)attempts 17–11goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – Montour2:02

    xG 0.17–0.05 (78%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestChiasson – Nygard – Haas6:45

    xG 0.13–0.07 (66%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  2. Sheahan – Archibald – Granlund9:09

    xG 0.25–0.32 (44%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

  3. Neal – Nugent-Hopkins – Khaira8:59

    xG 0.24–0.49 (33%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Kassian – Draisaitl – McDavid15:44

    xG 0.50–1.13 (31%)attempts 11–23goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Klefbom – Persson13:27

    xG 0.40–0.42 (49%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  2. Russell – Larsson13:29

    xG 0.33–0.72 (32%)attempts 4–14goals 0–1

  3. Nurse – Bear16:41

    xG 0.30–0.75 (29%)attempts 11–19goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.6 xGBUF 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 65/100 · #377 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.55 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 54% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).