Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 14, 2019·Honda Center, Anaheim

New York Rangers 3, Anaheim Ducks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 56% of the time.

ANA winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NYR21103116021332
ANA110118113012442

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:10NYRMika ZibanejadUnassisted · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:59NYRArtemi PanarinAssists: Ryan Strome · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P1 8:53ANAJakob SilfverbergPPAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Rickard Rakell · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:02ANAErik GudbransonAssists: Adam Henrique, Rickard Rakell · Snap, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:14NYRMika ZibanejadAssists: Tony DeAngelo · Snap, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:14ANAHampus LindholmPPAssists: Rickard Rakell · Slap, 0.08 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. NYR Artemi Panarin stopped
  2. 2. ANA Rickard Rakell stopped
  3. 3. NYR Mika Zibanejad scored
  4. 4. ANA Maxime Comtois stopped
  5. 5. NYR Tony DeAngelo stopped
  6. 6. ANA Ondrej Kase scored
  7. 7. NYR Kaapo Kakko stopped
  8. 8. ANA Jakob Silfverberg scored
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 6:56NYRAdam Fox: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:11ANASam Steel: Interference2 min
  3. P2 8:41NYRMarc Staal: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 9:24NYRJesper Fast: Holding2 min
  5. P2 9:24ANAHampus Lindholm: Holding2 min
  6. P2 11:13NYRRyan Lindgren: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 11:02ANACam Fowler: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 16:49NYRBrady Skjei: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
45% to win55% to win
← NYR attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Zibanejad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRANA
32Shots on goal42
3.2Expected goals3.5
57Shot attempts71
20Faceoffs won39
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
14Hits19
12Blocked shots13
12Giveaways17
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Panarin – Kakko11:19

    xG 0.75–0.62 (55%)attempts 12–9goals 1–1

  2. McKegg – Buchnevich – Chytil2:56

    xG 0.34–0.21 (62%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Kreider – Zibanejad – Buchnevich5:52

    xG 0.26–0.19 (57%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  4. Fast – Zibanejad – Lemieux2:51

    xG 0.20–0.26 (44%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFox – Lindgren8:45

    xG 0.39–0.06 (87%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  2. Skjei – Trouba13:02

    xG 0.42–0.59 (42%)attempts 10–14goals 1–0

  3. Staal – DeAngelo10:11

    xG 0.35–0.89 (28%)attempts 6–15goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestTerry – Steel – Comtois9:52

    xG 0.77–0.30 (72%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Shore – Kase6:18

    xG 0.14–0.25 (36%)attempts 4–3goals 0–2

  3. Getzlaf – Rakell – Kase3:02

    xG 0.13–0.25 (34%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Henrique – Silfverberg – Rakell8:49

    xG 0.26–0.38 (41%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Fowler – Gudbranson14:30

    xG 0.93–0.96 (49%)attempts 16–15goals 1–1

  2. Del Zotto – Mahura13:14

    xG 0.51–0.57 (48%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  3. Manson – Lindholm16:06

    xG 0.78–0.85 (48%)attempts 18–16goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.5 xGNYR 3.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANANYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #88 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.43 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 56% of the time.

ANA winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).