Thu, Dec 19, 2019·Bell MTS Place, Winnipeg
Chicago Blackhawks 4, Winnipeg Jets 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 57% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 112 | 03 | 317 | 432 |
| WPG | 016 | 014 | 17 | 137 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 0:59CHIAlex NylanderAssists: Patrick Kane, Dylan Strome · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–0
- P3 0:37CHIDominik KubalikGWGAssists: Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–0
- P3 5:09WPGTucker PoolmanAssists: Nikolaj Ehlers, Josh Morrissey · Slap, 0.04 xG2–1
- P3 10:58CHIErik GustafssonPPAssists: Patrick Kane · Slap, 0.08 xG3–1
- P3 16:39CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Alex Nylander, Adam Boqvist · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–1
Penalties (4)
- P1 18:08CHIDominik Kubalik: Slashing2 min
- P2 5:29CHIDennis Gilbert: Holding2 min
- P2 9:58WPGJosh Morrissey: Tripping2 min
- P3 9:49WPGJoona Luoto: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Wheeler won the faceoff against Toews
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestKane – Strome – Nylander7:32
xG 0.65–0.15 (81%)attempts 10–10goals 2–0
- Toews – Saad – Kubalik6:06
xG 0.31–0.22 (59%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0
- Kane – Carpenter – Dach3:36
xG 0.05–0.09 (35%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
- Kane – Strome – DeBrincat2:29
xG 0.07–0.19 (27%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestKeith – Boqvist13:23
xG 0.75–0.23 (77%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0
- Keith – Murphy3:18
xG 0.42–0.05 (89%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Maatta – Gilbert13:26
xG 0.41–0.30 (57%)attempts 8–14goals 1–0
Winnipeg Jets
Forward lines
- bestBourque – Lowry – Appleton8:30
xG 0.47–0.16 (74%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0
- Shaw – Shore – Luoto4:48
xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Wheeler – Ehlers – Roslovic14:41
xG 0.24–0.56 (30%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0
- Scheifele – Connor – Laine15:16
xG 0.54–1.45 (27%)attempts 16–24goals 0–3
Defence pairs
- bestBitetto – Beaulieu13:29
xG 0.62–0.27 (70%)attempts 18–9goals 0–0
- Poolman – Morrissey16:20
xG 0.48–0.72 (40%)attempts 17–15goals 1–2
- Sbisa – Pionk20:26
xG 0.46–1.19 (28%)attempts 22–17goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 57% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (WPG − CHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).