Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 20, 2019·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT2916211526
EDM0102909228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:56PITChad RuhwedelAssists: Dominik Kahun, Zachary Aston-Reese · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:56PITJoseph BlandisiAssists: Zachary Aston-Reese, Marcus Pettersson · Backhand, 0.14 xG2–0
  3. P2 6:41EDMZack KassianAssists: Darnell Nurse, Ethan Bear · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:38PITJared McCannGWGUnassisted · Backhand, 0.31 xG3–1
  5. P2 19:37EDMRiley SheahanSHAssists: Josh Archibald · Snap, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 0:38PITKris LetangPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Bryan Rust · Slap, 0.06 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:42PITBrandon TanevENAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Teddy Blueger · Wrist, 0.62 xG5–2
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 10:49PITJoseph Blandisi: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 18:34PITJohn Marino: Holding2 min
  3. P2 18:50EDMJoakim Nygard: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P3 18:36PITEvgeni Malkin: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P3 18:36EDMMike Smith: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITEDM
26Shots on goal28
3.0Expected goals3.2
45Shot attempts53
27Faceoffs won22
1Power plays2
6Penalty minutes4
23Hits29
8Blocked shots12
13Giveaways19
11Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMcCann – Aston-Reese – Kahun12:10

    xG 0.41–0.29 (59%)attempts 8–8goals 2–0

  2. Malkin – Rust – Guentzel16:33

    xG 0.97–0.87 (53%)attempts 14–16goals 0–1

  3. Blueger – Simon – Tanev11:41

    xG 0.29–0.35 (46%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  4. Galchenyuk – Blandisi – Lafferty5:33

    xG 0.03–0.50 (6%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRuhwedel – Riikola10:22

    xG 0.27–0.15 (65%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  2. Pettersson – Marino17:18

    xG 0.95–0.89 (52%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Letang20:11

    xG 0.32–0.89 (27%)attempts 13–19goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestKassian – Nugent-Hopkins – McDavid16:03

    xG 0.76–0.16 (82%)attempts 16–9goals 1–0

  2. Chiasson – Nygard – Haas8:42

    xG 0.65–0.47 (58%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  3. Neal – Chiasson – Draisaitl2:10

    xG 0.13–0.05 (72%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Sheahan – Archibald – Khaira8:01

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRussell – Jones12:06

    xG 0.54–0.17 (76%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Larsson – Klefbom15:58

    xG 0.63–0.74 (46%)attempts 17–15goals 0–1

  3. Nurse – Bear19:19

    xG 0.86–1.02 (46%)attempts 13–16goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.2 xGPIT 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #525 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.22 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).