Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 2, 2020·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Edmonton Oilers 2, Buffalo Sabres 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

BUF winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
EDM214080500227
BUF150101813326

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:06EDMRiley SheahanAssists: Josh Archibald, Adam Larsson · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:00EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Kailer Yamamoto, Leon Draisaitl · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–0
  3. P1 8:39BUFCurtis LazarAssists: Marcus Johansson · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:53BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Zach Bogosian, Victor Olofsson · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. OT 1:09BUFJack EichelGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.26 xG2–3
Penalties (4)
  1. P2 3:56EDMZack Kassian: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 8:55BUFMarcus Johansson: Tripping2 min
  3. P3 11:01EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Slashing2 min
  4. OT 1:09EDMOscar Klefbom: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← EDM attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against McDavid
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMBUF
27Shots on goal26
1.9Expected goals2.4
40Shot attempts43
32Faceoffs won17
1Power plays2
4Penalty minutes2
19Hits19
9Blocked shots5
9Giveaways6
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestNugent-Hopkins – Draisaitl – Yamamoto13:40

    xG 0.59–0.07 (89%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  2. Neal – Kassian – McDavid15:39

    xG 0.61–0.46 (57%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

  3. Chiasson – Nygard – Haas6:53

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Sheahan – Archibald – Khaira7:58

    xG 0.31–0.79 (28%)attempts 5–7goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlefbom – Bear20:16

    xG 0.68–0.37 (65%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  2. Russell – Nurse20:04

    xG 0.56–0.46 (55%)attempts 10–17goals 0–1

  3. Larsson – Lagesson9:21

    xG 0.29–0.87 (25%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Vesey – Sheary9:27

    xG 0.30–0.22 (57%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  2. Reinhart – Eichel – Asplund4:35

    xG 0.05–0.05 (51%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Okposo – Larsson – Girgensons11:40

    xG 0.21–0.51 (29%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Reinhart – Olofsson – Eichel12:04

    xG 0.11–0.66 (14%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiller – Dahlin7:16

    xG 0.69–0.04 (94%)attempts 10–1goals 1–0

  2. Bogosian – McCabe6:17

    xG 0.15–0.08 (66%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Bogosian – Miller3:43

    xG 0.16–0.13 (54%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.4 xGEDM 1.9 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #253 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.89 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

BUF winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).