Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 5, 2020·Capital One Arena, Washington

San Jose Sharks 4, Washington Capitals 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 72% of the time.

WSH winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS0133111302429
WSH0102122611529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 6:25SJSEvander KanePPAssists: Joe Thornton, Timo Meier · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:29WSHNic DowdAssists: Brendan Leipsic, Michal Kempny · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:06SJSEvander KaneAssists: Logan Couture, Melker Karlsson · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 16:49SJSEvander KanePPAssists: Erik Karlsson, Timo Meier · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P2 18:42WSHJakub VranaAssists: T.J. Oshie · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:00SJSLogan CoutureENAssists: Tomas Hertl, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.65 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:13WSHJakub VranaAssists: Lars Eller, Radko Gudas · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:45WSHT.J. OshieAssists: Evgeny Kuznetsov, Nicklas Backstrom · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:01WSHLars EllerGWGAssists: John Carlson, Braden Holtby · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 5:13WSHRichard Panik: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 7:56SJSEvander Kane: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 15:29WSHRadko Gudas: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P3 4:31WSHNic Dowd: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P3 10:26SJSEvander Kane: Interference2 min
  6. P3 14:52WSHJohn Carlson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
45% to win55% to win
← SJS attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSWSH
29Shots on goal29
3.5Expected goals2.3
62Shot attempts52
27Faceoffs won31
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
18Hits19
14Blocked shots18
7Giveaways13
9Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMarleau – Couture – Hertl12:35

    xG 1.17–0.32 (79%)attempts 17–11goals 0–0

  2. Noesen – Karlsson – Kellman6:11

    xG 0.14–0.30 (33%)attempts 3–7goals 0–2

  3. Kane – Goodrow – Meier12:41

    xG 0.28–0.46 (38%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – Sorensen – Labanc9:53

    xG 0.16–0.53 (24%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFerraro – Simek11:46

    xG 1.09–0.52 (68%)attempts 14–13goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Dillon18:05

    xG 0.64–0.40 (61%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

  3. Vlasic – Karlsson14:44

    xG 0.23–0.83 (22%)attempts 13–18goals 0–2

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestOshie – Kuznetsov – Vrana12:51

    xG 0.74–0.14 (84%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  2. Dowd – Leipsic – Hathaway8:01

    xG 0.45–0.27 (63%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  3. Hagelin – Eller – Panik8:21

    xG 0.31–0.19 (61%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  4. Ovechkin – Backstrom – Wilson10:32

    xG 0.23–1.08 (18%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGudas – Kempny2:38

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Orlov – Gudas2:18

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Carlson – Orlov3:57

    xG 0.13–0.01 (90%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 2.3 xGSJS 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #42 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.55 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 0% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +49 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 72% of the time.

WSH winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).