Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 11, 2020·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Vancouver Canucks 6, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN11319413635
BUF1919110328

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:44BUFBrandon MontourAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Jack Eichel · Slap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:33VANBrock BoeserAssists: Troy Stecher, J.T. Miller · Tip-in, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:44VANBo HorvatSHAssists: Tanner Pearson, Quinn Hughes · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:25BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Jack Eichel · Slap, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P3 1:17VANJ.T. MillerAssists: Elias Pettersson · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P3 3:28BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Kyle Okposo, Rasmus Ristolainen · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:24VANBrock BoeserGWGAssists: Chris Tanev · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 7:38VANJake VirtanenAssists: Tyler Motte, Adam Gaudette · Wrist, 0.14 xG5–3
  9. P3 17:48VANLoui ErikssonAssists: Bo Horvat, Tanner Pearson · Wrist, 0.57 xG6–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 3:17BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 6:05VANJay Beagle: Holding2 min
  3. P2 6:07VANJay Beagle: Holding2 min
  4. P2 9:34VANElias Pettersson: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 11:01BUFKyle Okposo: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← VAN attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Horvat won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANBUF
35Shots on goal28
2.9Expected goals2.4
56Shot attempts49
30Faceoffs won27
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
11Hits15
12Blocked shots6
0Giveaways8
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestMiller – Boeser – Pettersson10:24

    xG 0.71–0.22 (76%)attempts 13–9goals 3–0

  2. Roussel – Virtanen – Gaudette10:51

    xG 0.33–0.18 (65%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  3. Beagle – Schaller – Motte8:03

    xG 0.22–0.47 (32%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  4. Eriksson – Pearson – Horvat13:09

    xG 0.42–0.92 (32%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTanev – Hughes12:57

    xG 0.46–0.10 (82%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Edler – Stecher12:33

    xG 0.50–0.35 (59%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  3. Edler – Myers2:54

    xG 0.05–0.03 (60%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestFrolik – Johansson – Sheary8:59

    xG 0.76–0.42 (64%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

  2. Johansson – Sheary – Rodrigues2:11

    xG 0.17–0.01 (93%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Johansson – Reinhart – Eichel3:00

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  4. Vesey – Reinhart – Eichel12:51

    xG 0.57–0.52 (52%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMontour – Dahlin17:32

    xG 1.12–0.43 (72%)attempts 19–14goals 1–1

  2. Jokiharju – Pilut15:13

    xG 0.52–0.65 (44%)attempts 9–11goals 0–2

  3. McCabe – Ristolainen12:45

    xG 0.16–0.84 (16%)attempts 9–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.4 xGVAN 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #74 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.33 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 61% of the time.

BUF winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).