Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 16, 2020·TD Garden, Boston

Pittsburgh Penguins 1, Boston Bruins 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 59% of the time.

BOS winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT110010010130
BOS21201226430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:24PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Dominik Simon, Jack Johnson · Slap, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:03BOSSean KuralyAssists: Karson Kuhlman, Charlie McAvoy · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:16BOSPar LindholmGWGAssists: Karson Kuhlman · Deflected, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P3 3:19BOSPatrice BergeronAssists: David Pastrnak · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P3 19:07BOSBrad MarchandENAssists: David Pastrnak · Wrist, 0.65 xG1–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 1:16PITZachary Aston-Reese: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 3:23PITJohn Marino: Boarding2 min
  3. P1 7:33PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 7:33BOSChris Wagner: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 13:19BOSPatrice Bergeron: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 1:39BOSChris Wagner: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 9:47BOSAnders Bjork: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 16:05PITPatric Hornqvist: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 16:05BOSTorey Krug: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 18:11PITPatric Hornqvist: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 18:11BOSTorey Krug: Fighting5 min
  12. P2 18:41PITMarcus Pettersson: Holding2 min
  13. P3 11:42PITPatric Hornqvist: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBOS
30Shots on goal30
3.0Expected goals3.6
53Shot attempts55
27Faceoffs won31
3Power plays4
17Penalty minutes15
30Hits23
14Blocked shots12
15Giveaways6
15Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – McCann – Simon10:47

    xG 0.33–0.08 (81%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  2. Malkin – Rust – Kahun6:51

    xG 0.14–0.08 (63%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Hornqvist – Agozzino – Galchenyuk3:14

    xG 0.10–0.10 (50%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

  4. Blueger – Tanev – Aston-Reese7:37

    xG 0.15–0.18 (47%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPettersson – Marino11:58

    xG 0.36–0.22 (62%)attempts 13–8goals 0–2

  2. Ruhwedel – Riikola5:47

    xG 0.17–0.10 (62%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Letang – Riikola2:46

    xG 0.01–0.05 (21%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak8:10

    xG 0.51–0.21 (71%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

  2. Coyle – Bjork – DeBrusk8:02

    xG 0.11–0.06 (66%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Heinen – Kuhlman – Lindholm4:33

    xG 0.07–0.19 (27%)attempts 2–3goals 1–0

  4. Wagner – Nordstrom – Kuraly8:28

    xG 0.03–0.22 (13%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – McAvoy9:30

    xG 0.29–0.09 (76%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Grzelcyk – Carlo3:16

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Krug – Carlo9:16

    xG 0.42–0.36 (53%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.6 xGPIT 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 32/100 · #759 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.08 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 59% of the time.

BOS winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).