Sun, Jan 19, 2020·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh
Boston Bruins 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 62% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 314 | 010 | 014 | 338 |
| PIT | 16 | 112 | 24 | 422 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 0:11BOSPatrice BergeronAssists: David Pastrnak, Brandon Carlo · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–0
- P1 2:02BOSAnders BjorkAssists: Charlie Coyle, Jake DeBrusk · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–0
- P1 15:07BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Brad Marchand, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–0
- P1 16:34PITDominik SimonAssists: Sidney Crosby, Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–1
- P2 0:33PITTeddy BluegerAssists: Sidney Crosby, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–2
- P3 1:41PITJack JohnsonSHAssists: Brandon Tanev · Slap, 0.07 xG3–3
- P3 12:35PITBryan RustGWGAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.19 xG3–4
Penalties (6)
- P1 18:23PITTeddy Blueger: Hooking2 min
- P2 12:09BOSChris Wagner: Interference2 min
- P2 13:00BOSBrad Marchand: Roughing2 min
- P2 13:00PITKris Letang: Roughing2 min
- P3 0:20PITKris Letang: Elbowing2 min
- P3 19:04BOSMatt Grzelcyk: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Crosby
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestCoyle – Bjork – DeBrusk11:30
xG 0.73–0.22 (77%)attempts 18–5goals 1–1
- Bergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak12:01
xG 0.61–0.27 (69%)attempts 17–4goals 2–0
- Heinen – Kuhlman – Lindholm10:12
xG 0.21–0.14 (60%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0
- Wagner – Nordstrom – Kuraly8:41
xG 0.09–0.51 (16%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestGrzelcyk – McAvoy6:09
xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0
- Chara – Carlo4:19
xG 0.37–0.15 (72%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0
- Grzelcyk – Carlo2:47
xG 0.25–0.03 (88%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forward lines
- bestMalkin – Rust – McCann8:33
xG 0.43–0.18 (70%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0
- Crosby – Hornqvist – Simon6:06
xG 0.14–0.02 (89%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0
- Blueger – Tanev – Aston-Reese12:41
xG 0.43–0.45 (49%)attempts 7–17goals 0–0
- Malkin – Rust – Kahun5:55
xG 0.02–0.18 (10%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestPettersson – Marino17:49
xG 0.67–0.58 (54%)attempts 12–19goals 0–0
- Ruhwedel – Riikola11:22
xG 0.31–0.41 (43%)attempts 6–12goals 1–1
- Johnson – Letang19:46
xG 0.49–1.14 (30%)attempts 13–27goals 1–2
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 62% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (PIT − BOS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).