Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 1, 2020·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Boston Bruins 6, Minnesota Wild 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 84% of the time.

MIN winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS112312210634
MIN0110817126

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:28BOSTorey KrugAssists: Par Lindholm, David Krejci · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:39BOSTorey KrugPPGWGAssists: Brad Marchand, David Pastrnak · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–0
  3. P2 5:55BOSBrad MarchandPPAssists: Torey Krug, David Pastrnak · Slap, 0.07 xG3–0
  4. P2 15:29BOSDavid PastrnakPPAssists: David Krejci, Jake DeBrusk · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–0
  5. P3 14:31MINMats ZuccarelloAssists: Carson Soucy, Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–1
  6. P3 18:02BOSAnders BjorkAssists: Joakim Nordstrom · Wrist, 0.18 xG5–1
  7. P3 18:33BOSJake DeBruskAssists: Karson Kuhlman, Torey Krug · Slap, 0.13 xG6–1
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 17:25BOSCharlie McAvoy: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 3:49MINRyan Hartman: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 5:21MINEric Staal: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 11:19BOSCharlie McAvoy: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 12:36BOSBrad Marchand: Interference2 min
  6. P2 12:36MINMikko Koivu: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 14:32MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P2 17:40BOSJake DeBrusk: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 6:54BOSZdeno Chara: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 11:17MINJonas Brodin: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
45% to win55% to win
← BOS attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Coyle won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSMIN
34Shots on goal26
3.5Expected goals1.5
61Shot attempts54
33Faceoffs won28
4Power plays4
10Penalty minutes10
6Hits19
14Blocked shots14
2Giveaways10
3Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestKrejci – DeBrusk – Kuhlman10:35

    xG 0.70–0.19 (79%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  2. Wagner – Blidh – Lindholm9:25

    xG 0.44–0.04 (91%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  3. Coyle – Nordstrom – Bjork8:32

    xG 0.24–0.16 (60%)attempts 5–8goals 1–1

  4. Bergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak9:48

    xG 0.07–0.37 (16%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGrzelcyk – Lauzon13:27

    xG 0.37–0.08 (83%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  2. Krug – Carlo11:35

    xG 0.43–0.23 (65%)attempts 10–10goals 2–0

  3. Krug – McAvoy2:33

    xG 0.02–0.02 (41%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Parise – Zuccarello12:13

    xG 0.61–0.43 (58%)attempts 13–8goals 1–1

  2. Foligno – Eriksson Ek – Kunin11:37

    xG 0.27–0.11 (71%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Rask – Hartman – Greenway4:14

    xG 0.03–0.18 (15%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

  4. Koivu – Zucker – Fiala5:25

    xG 0.01–0.16 (8%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPateryn – Soucy13:41

    xG 0.55–0.45 (55%)attempts 16–14goals 1–2

  2. Suter – Spurgeon15:08

    xG 0.27–0.48 (36%)attempts 12–12goals 0–1

  3. Brodin – Dumba17:58

    xG 0.31–0.64 (32%)attempts 11–19goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.5 xGBOS 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #947 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.62 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 84% of the time.

MIN winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).