Sat, Feb 1, 2020·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles
Anaheim Ducks 3, Los Angeles Kings 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 56% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANA | 113 | 211 | 04 | 328 |
| LAK | 014 | 115 | 018 | 147 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 5:43ANAMax JonesAssists: Sam Steel, Ondrej Kase · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–0
- P2 2:33ANADerek GrantGWGAssists: Cam Fowler, Josh Manson · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–0
- P2 6:52ANAJacob LarssonAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Rickard Rakell · Slap, 0.02 xG3–0
- P2 17:21LAKTyler ToffoliPPAssists: Anze Kopitar, Alec Martinez · Slap, 0.19 xG3–1
Penalties (5)
- P2 4:06ANAMichael Del Zotto: Holding2 min
- P2 7:11LAKAdrian Kempe: Holding2 min
- P2 9:37LAKKurtis MacDermid: Fighting5 min
- P2 9:37ANANicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
- P2 16:18ANACam Fowler: Holding2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Kopitar
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestGrant – Deslauriers – Rowney8:15
xG 0.72–0.36 (67%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0
- Henrique – Ritchie – Terry9:53
xG 0.56–0.34 (62%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0
- Kase – Steel – Jones10:59
xG 0.49–0.46 (51%)attempts 10–12goals 1–0
- Getzlaf – Silfverberg – Rakell15:56
xG 0.51–0.96 (35%)attempts 10–25goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestFowler – Manson18:13
xG 1.07–0.81 (57%)attempts 16–18goals 1–0
- Del Zotto – Larsson11:36
xG 0.41–0.30 (58%)attempts 7–15goals 2–0
- Gudbranson – Lindholm17:44
xG 0.77–0.99 (44%)attempts 15–27goals 0–0
Los Angeles Kings
Forward lines
- bestBrown – Kopitar – Iafallo12:55
xG 0.71–0.30 (70%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0
- Carter – Toffoli – Kempe8:26
xG 0.61–0.31 (66%)attempts 16–4goals 0–0
- Clifford – Wagner – Lizotte2:25
xG 0.08–0.16 (35%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
- Wagner – Luff – Lizotte5:33
xG 0.25–0.42 (38%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestHutton – Roy15:45
xG 1.01–0.90 (53%)attempts 27–13goals 0–2
- Forbort – Roy2:06
xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0
- Martinez – Forbort14:13
xG 0.50–0.67 (43%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 56% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (LAK − ANA), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).