Fri, Feb 7, 2020·Nationwide Arena, Columbus
Detroit Red Wings 0, Columbus Blue Jackets 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 94% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 05 | 04 | 07 | 016 |
| CBJ | 010 | 121 | 113 | 244 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 4:57CBJZach WerenskiGWGAssists: Nick Foligno, Sonny Milano · Snap, 0.14 xG0–1
- P3 18:35CBJBoone JennerENAssists: Gustav Nyquist · Wrist, 0.67 xG0–2
Penalties (6)
- P1 8:02DETBrendan Perlini: Too many men on the ice2 min
- P2 1:24DETAndreas Athanasiou: Slashing2 min
- P2 10:01DETBrendan Perlini: Too many men on the ice2 min
- P3 5:55CBJSeth Jones: Slashing2 min
- P3 12:39CBJPierre-Luc Dubois: Hooking2 min
- P3 0:00DETFilip Hronek: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Larkin won the faceoff against Dubois
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Detroit Red Wings
Forward lines
- Erne – Ehn – Smith3:47
xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Abdelkader – Larkin – Fabbri7:09
xG 0.10–0.17 (37%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
- Glendening – Athanasiou – Hirose6:51
xG 0.12–0.25 (32%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0
- Bertuzzi – Larkin – Fabbri4:43
xG 0.02–0.21 (10%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Nemeth – Hronek3:00
xG 0.01–0.04 (13%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
- Hronek – Lindstrom5:17
xG 0.12–0.20 (39%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0
- Bowey – Hronek2:33
xG 0.06–0.17 (28%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forward lines
- bestFoligno – Bjorkstrand – Dubois13:43
xG 1.33–0.20 (87%)attempts 20–10goals 0–0
- Nyquist – Atkinson – Jenner10:13
xG 0.84–0.22 (79%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0
- Nash – Milano – Bemstrom9:09
xG 0.11–0.18 (37%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
- Gerbe – MacInnis – Robinson5:42
xG 0.08–0.18 (31%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestJones – Werenski17:04
xG 1.37–0.24 (85%)attempts 22–12goals 0–0
- Savard – Gavrikov16:04
xG 0.72–0.21 (77%)attempts 15–7goals 0–0
- Harrington – Nutivaara11:06
xG 0.52–0.25 (67%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 94% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CBJ − DET), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).