Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 7, 2020·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Minnesota Wild 3, Dallas Stars 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 57% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN01229110331
DAL1161908233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:28DALJoe PavelskiAssists: Tyler Seguin, John Klingberg · Snap, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:51DALDenis GurianovSHAssists: Miro Heiskanen, Ben Bishop · Slap, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:25MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Ryan Suter, Marcus Foligno · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:09MINRyan DonatoAssists: Luke Kunin, Kevin Fiala · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P3 19:33MINJoel Eriksson EkGWGAssists: Jonas Brodin, Jordan Greenway · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG3–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 2:23MINLuke Kunin: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 15:14MINJared Spurgeon: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 15:28MINJonas Brodin: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P1 16:16DALRadek Faksa: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 0:50MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 3:55DALAndrew Cogliano: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 12:22DALBlake Comeau: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 0:00MINJordan Greenway: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 0:00DALCorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 14:07MINKevin Fiala: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Seguin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINDAL
31Shots on goal33
2.7Expected goals2.3
59Shot attempts65
27Faceoffs won24
2Power plays6
14Penalty minutes8
12Hits32
21Blocked shots16
10Giveaways20
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek10:18

    xG 0.90–0.28 (76%)attempts 22–9goals 2–0

  2. Staal – Parise – Fiala4:09

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Fiala – Donato – Kunin6:27

    xG 0.21–0.18 (54%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  4. Zuccarello – Donato – Kunin2:23

    xG 0.04–0.08 (35%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba13:10

    xG 0.65–0.45 (59%)attempts 18–16goals 2–1

  2. Suter – Spurgeon13:26

    xG 0.21–0.17 (55%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  3. Pateryn – Brodin2:28

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestComeau – Cogliano – Faksa8:05

    xG 0.47–0.13 (78%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  2. Pavelski – Radulov – Janmark3:55

    xG 0.31–0.08 (79%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Benn – Seguin – Hintz5:34

    xG 0.18–0.11 (62%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  4. Comeau – Cogliano – Dickinson2:37

    xG 0.06–0.01 (86%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohns – Heiskanen12:50

    xG 0.37–0.18 (68%)attempts 18–10goals 0–0

  2. Klingberg – Lindell12:21

    xG 0.34–0.27 (56%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  3. Polak – Lindell2:26

    xG 0.08–0.01 (90%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 2.3 xGMIN 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 78/100 · #231 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.94 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +49 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 57% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).