Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 10, 2020·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Nashville Predators 2, Vancouver Canucks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 64% of the time.

VAN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH01221907238
VAN3162719632

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:06VANZack MacEwenAssists: J.T. Miller, Troy Stecher · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:44VANBrandon SutterPPAssists: Elias Pettersson, Quinn Hughes · Deflected, 0.19 xG0–2
  3. P1 13:51VANJordie BennGWGAssists: Adam Gaudette, Antoine Roussel · Slap, 0.01 xG0–3
  4. P2 0:58VANTanner PearsonAssists: Elias Pettersson, Alexander Edler · Deflected, 0.16 xG0–4
  5. P2 5:59NSHCraig SmithPPAssists: Roman Josi, Calle Jarnkrok · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–4
  6. P2 7:05NSHMikael GranlundAssists: Dante Fabbro, Nick Bonino · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–4
  7. P2 18:00VANJ.T. MillerAssists: Quinn Hughes · Deflected, 0.10 xG2–5
  8. P3 2:32VANJake VirtanenPPAssists: Quinn Hughes, Adam Gaudette · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–6
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 10:58NSHAustin Watson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:46VANQuinn Hughes: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 5:01VANTyler Myers: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 5:01VANTyler Myers: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 5:01NSHAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 9:27VANJ.T. Miller: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 1:09NSHColton Sissons: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  8. P3 5:40NSHViktor Arvidsson: Bench2 min
  9. P3 7:50NSHJarred Tinordi: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 10:02VANElias Pettersson: Interference2 min
  11. P3 17:00NSHDan Hamhuis: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 17:00VANJake Virtanen: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 18:14VANAntoine Roussel: Slashing2 min
  14. P3 18:14VANAntoine Roussel: Cross checking2 min
  15. P3 18:14VANAntoine Roussel: Misconduct10 min
  16. P3 18:14NSHJarred Tinordi: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
45% to win55% to win
← NSH attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Horvat
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHVAN
38Shots on goal32
3.3Expected goals2.4
67Shot attempts52
29Faceoffs won37
6Power plays4
33Penalty minutes37
16Hits21
13Blocked shots13
5Giveaways7
0Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJarnkrok – Watson – Sissons8:16

    xG 0.49–0.07 (88%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  2. Bonino – Smith – Grimaldi8:09

    xG 0.44–0.27 (62%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

  3. Duchene – Johansen – Granlund4:37

    xG 0.07–0.01 (90%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Turris – Forsberg – Arvidsson4:40

    xG 0.09–0.19 (31%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Josi9:40

    xG 0.64–0.25 (72%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  2. Hamhuis – Fabbro4:09

    xG 0.28–0.06 (83%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  3. Josi – Fabbro8:53

    xG 0.40–0.32 (55%)attempts 12–7goals 0–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestPearson – Virtanen – Pettersson6:29

    xG 0.24–0.13 (65%)attempts 4–6goals 1–0

  2. Eriksson – Beagle – Bailey6:57

    xG 0.08–0.11 (42%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Sutter – Roussel – Gaudette8:17

    xG 0.22–0.28 (43%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  4. Miller – Horvat – MacEwen8:11

    xG 0.15–0.43 (25%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Stecher13:04

    xG 0.63–0.50 (56%)attempts 13–19goals 2–0

  2. Tanev – Hughes10:05

    xG 0.55–0.57 (49%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Myers – Benn13:09

    xG 0.33–0.48 (40%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.4 xGNSH 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #413 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.76 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 64% of the time.

VAN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).