Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 13, 2020·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Philadelphia Flyers 6, Florida Panthers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

FLA winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI3911425628
FLA0110829228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:24PHIJames van RiemsdykAssists: Matt Niskanen, Travis Sanheim · Slap, 0.22 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:37PHITyler PitlickAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Matt Niskanen · Snap, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P1 18:32PHINicolas Aube-KubelGWGAssists: Michael Raffl, Justin Braun · Snap, 0.30 xG3–0
  4. P2 18:58PHIScott LaughtonAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Justin Braun · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–0
  5. P3 0:33FLAJonathan HuberdeauAssists: MacKenzie Weegar, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–1
  6. P3 4:56FLAAleksander BarkovAssists: Keith Yandle, Anton Stralman · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–2
  7. P3 14:52PHISean CouturierAssists: Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.19 xG5–2
  8. P3 19:32PHIRobert HaggPPAssists: Michael Raffl, Justin Braun · Slap, 0.28 xG6–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 2:12FLAJoshua Brown: Holding2 min
  2. P1 11:46FLADominic Toninato: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 11:00PHIJustin Braun: Holding2 min
  4. P3 19:04PHIJames van Riemsdyk: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 19:04FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P3 19:04FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
45% to win55% to win
← PHI attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Acciari
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIFLA
28Shots on goal28
3.7Expected goals2.2
42Shot attempts44
37Faceoffs won24
3Power plays1
4Penalty minutes8
15Hits22
12Blocked shots8
5Giveaways9
7Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestRaffl – Aube-Kubel – Bunnaman9:06

    xG 0.89–0.15 (86%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Pitlick – Laughton9:03

    xG 0.67–0.12 (85%)attempts 10–6goals 2–1

  3. Giroux – Voracek – Couturier12:28

    xG 0.41–0.41 (50%)attempts 7–6goals 1–1

  4. Hayes – Konecny – Farabee12:54

    xG 0.63–0.86 (42%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBraun – Hagg11:49

    xG 1.33–0.25 (84%)attempts 13–10goals 2–0

  2. Sanheim – Myers8:50

    xG 0.83–0.32 (73%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0

  3. Hagg – Myers4:39

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 1–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestHoffman – Trocheck – Vatrano2:54

    xG 0.49–0.11 (82%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Dadonov – Huberdeau – Barkov16:39

    xG 0.49–0.27 (65%)attempts 12–5goals 2–0

  3. Connolly – Toninato – Vatrano2:07

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Sceviour – Toninato – Vatrano2:36

    xG 0.07–0.26 (21%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrown – Stillman2:16

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Stralman – Stillman8:05

    xG 0.20–0.20 (51%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Stralman – Weegar2:05

    xG 0.23–0.27 (46%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.2 xGPHI 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #412 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.76 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

FLA winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).