Thu, Feb 13, 2020·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville
New York Islanders 0, Nashville Predators 5
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 60% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYI | 014 | 013 | 04 | 031 |
| NSH | 310 | 211 | 05 | 526 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 0:35NSHCraig SmithGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
- P1 7:41NSHCraig SmithAssists: Rocco Grimaldi, Nick Bonino · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
- P1 13:33NSHMattias EkholmAssists: Calle Jarnkrok, Austin Watson · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
- P2 4:41NSHRocco GrimaldiUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–4
- P2 11:38NSHCraig SmithAssists: Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–5
Penalties (4)
- P1 6:46NYIMatt Martin: Fighting5 min
- P1 6:46NSHAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
- P2 6:16NSHMikael Granlund: Holding2 min
- P2 15:02NSHDan Hamhuis: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Nelson won the faceoff against Bonino
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
New York Islanders
Forward lines
- bestEberle – Lee – Barzal14:54
xG 0.87–0.31 (73%)attempts 17–12goals 0–0
- Brassard – Dal Colle – Bellows9:59
xG 0.32–0.47 (41%)attempts 10–13goals 0–0
- Bailey – Nelson – Beauvillier12:41
xG 0.22–0.48 (31%)attempts 9–14goals 0–2
- Komarov – Martin – Bardreau9:07
xG 0.18–0.44 (29%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestPulock – Toews15:54
xG 0.49–0.25 (66%)attempts 12–11goals 0–1
- Leddy – Mayfield8:35
xG 0.54–0.38 (59%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0
- Mayfield – Dobson7:34
xG 0.21–0.11 (66%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0
Nashville Predators
Forward lines
- bestBonino – Smith – Grimaldi10:08
xG 0.62–0.09 (87%)attempts 12–6goals 4–0
- Jarnkrok – Watson – Sissons9:49
xG 0.34–0.22 (61%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0
- Johansen – Granlund – Arvidsson13:08
xG 0.50–0.51 (50%)attempts 18–13goals 0–0
- Turris – Duchene – Forsberg10:19
xG 0.31–0.37 (46%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestWeber – Josi13:09
xG 0.71–0.12 (86%)attempts 16–13goals 1–0
- Hamhuis – Fabbro12:23
xG 0.55–0.15 (78%)attempts 17–8goals 1–0
- Hamhuis – Weber3:29
xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it NYI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 60% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NSH − NYI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).