Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 16, 2020·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Edmonton Oilers 4, Carolina Hurricanes 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 53% of the time.

CAR winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
EDM192110311424
CAR1101611005331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:12CARTrevor van RiemsdykAssists: Jaccob Slavin, Sebastian Aho · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:28EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Jujhar Khaira, Darnell Nurse · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:19CARSebastian AhoAssists: Jaccob Slavin · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:33EDMKailer YamamotoPPAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Oscar Klefbom · Snap, 0.20 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:01EDMJosh ArchibaldAssists: Tyler Benson · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:58CARSebastian AhoAssists: Andrei Svechnikov, Teuvo Teravainen · Snap, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:57EDMJosh ArchibaldGWGAssists: Leon Draisaitl · Wrist, 0.37 xG4–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 4:27CARAndrei Svechnikov: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 19:14EDMAdam Larsson: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 6:18EDMJosh Archibald: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 6:18CARErik Haula: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 6:18CARNino Niederreiter: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 13:34CARErik Haula: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 5:30EDMJujhar Khaira: Holding2 min
  8. P3 10:43EDMColby Cave: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
45% to win55% to win
← EDM attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Draisaitl won the faceoff against Aho
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMCAR
24Shots on goal31
2.8Expected goals3.0
46Shot attempts56
22Faceoffs won32
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
19Hits17
10Blocked shots14
6Giveaways8
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestSheahan – Archibald – Benson11:01

    xG 0.66–0.08 (89%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  2. Chiasson – Granlund – Haas7:37

    xG 0.26–0.18 (59%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  3. Khaira – Cave – Russell8:37

    xG 0.24–0.29 (45%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Nugent-Hopkins – Draisaitl – Yamamoto12:23

    xG 0.31–0.68 (31%)attempts 12–14goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestNurse – Bear16:45

    xG 1.01–0.44 (70%)attempts 16–12goals 2–1

  2. Larsson – Klefbom18:06

    xG 0.81–0.51 (61%)attempts 14–12goals 0–2

  3. Larsson – Nurse2:02

    xG 0.01–0.07 (14%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – McGinn – Foegele2:28

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  2. Teravainen – Aho – Svechnikov12:46

    xG 0.55–0.46 (54%)attempts 12–9goals 3–1

  3. Williams – Staal – Foegele9:36

    xG 0.42–0.37 (54%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  4. Dzingel – McGinn – Wallmark4:55

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdmundson – Fleury13:21

    xG 0.48–0.43 (53%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  2. Slavin – Pesce5:06

    xG 0.30–0.33 (48%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  3. Gardiner – Pesce12:54

    xG 0.23–0.30 (43%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.0 xGEDM 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CAREDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #171 of 1082 this seasonSwing 2.20 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 53% of the time.

CAR winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).