Sun, Feb 16, 2020·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville
St. Louis Blues 1, Nashville Predators 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 61% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 013 | 112 | 014 | 139 |
| NSH | 06 | 16 | 112 | 224 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 7:55NSHCraig SmithAssists: Rocco Grimaldi, Nick Bonino · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–1
- P2 10:58STLTyler BozakAssists: Carl Gunnarsson, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–1
- P3 17:48NSHKyle TurrisGWGAssists: Filip Forsberg, Matt Duchene · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
Penalties (6)
- P1 17:47NSHAustin Watson: Hooking2 min
- P1 19:50STLZachary Sanford: Roughing2 min
- P1 19:50NSHAustin Watson: Roughing2 min
- P2 2:00NSHMikael Granlund: Tripping2 min
- P3 2:31STLDavid Perron: Slashing2 min
- P3 18:31STLRobert Thomas: Too many men on the ice2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Bonino won the faceoff against Sundqvist
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
St. Louis Blues
Forward lines
- bestBozak – Schenn – Schwartz10:03
xG 0.53–0.25 (68%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0
- Schenn – Schwartz – Thomas2:17
xG 0.13–0.02 (87%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
- Steen – Sundqvist – Barbashev9:27
xG 0.29–0.22 (56%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1
- Perron – O'Reilly – Sanford12:52
xG 0.94–0.92 (51%)attempts 20–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestPietrangelo – Dunn2:10
xG 0.35–0.02 (94%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
- Parayko – Dunn2:41
xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Pietrangelo – Faulk2:06
xG 0.16–0.06 (73%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
Nashville Predators
Forward lines
- bestTurris – Duchene – Forsberg11:13
xG 0.93–0.59 (61%)attempts 18–15goals 1–1
- Jarnkrok – Watson – Sissons8:02
xG 0.30–0.01 (96%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Bonino – Smith – Grimaldi10:15
xG 0.44–0.56 (44%)attempts 10–15goals 1–0
- Johansen – Granlund – Arvidsson10:15
xG 0.13–0.47 (22%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestEkholm – Fabbro2:04
xG 0.26–0.11 (71%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
- Ekholm – Tinordi15:09
xG 0.94–0.83 (53%)attempts 16–20goals 2–0
- Hamhuis – Fabbro9:45
xG 0.07–0.14 (33%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 61% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NSH − STL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).