Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 21, 2020·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Minnesota Wild 5, Edmonton Oilers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 82% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN117212210539
EDM2101808326

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:50EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Kailer Yamamoto, Ethan Bear · Snap, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:25MINKevin FialaAssists: Ryan Suter · Backhand, 0.27 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:04EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Kailer Yamamoto, Leon Draisaitl · Snap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:48MINCarson SoucyAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Alex Galchenyuk · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:01EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Matt Benning, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Backhand, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:55MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Alex Galchenyuk, Victor Rask · Slap, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. P3 10:07MINJared SpurgeonGWGAssists: Ryan Suter, Zach Parise · Backhand, 0.02 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:22MINJared SpurgeonENAssists: Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.67 xG5–3
Penalties (4)
  1. P2 14:51MINCarson Soucy: Holding2 min
  2. P3 1:47EDMAdam Larsson: Slashing2 min
  3. P3 11:40EDMAlex Chiasson: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 16:11MINJared Spurgeon: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sheahan won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINEDM
39Shots on goal26
3.5Expected goals1.7
64Shot attempts59
22Faceoffs won30
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
28Hits22
26Blocked shots13
13Giveaways13
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Rask – Hartman4:43

    xG 0.40–0.02 (95%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Koivu – Zuccarello – Galchenyuk2:15

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Greenway – Eriksson Ek10:37

    xG 0.43–0.31 (59%)attempts 8–16goals 0–1

  4. Koivu – Galchenyuk – Fiala3:21

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba19:39

    xG 1.13–0.55 (67%)attempts 22–21goals 0–1

  2. Suter – Spurgeon16:59

    xG 0.67–0.58 (53%)attempts 19–13goals 3–1

  3. Pateryn – Soucy9:01

    xG 0.08–0.20 (29%)attempts 4–10goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestNugent-Hopkins – Draisaitl – Yamamoto16:55

    xG 1.04–0.90 (54%)attempts 24–17goals 3–0

  2. Khaira – Cave – Russell5:16

    xG 0.15–0.07 (69%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Sheahan – Archibald – Khaira3:03

    xG 0.04–0.02 (69%)attempts 3–2goals 0–1

  4. Sheahan – Archibald – Benson7:25

    xG 0.23–0.23 (50%)attempts 5–11goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestNurse – Bear18:58

    xG 0.76–0.50 (60%)attempts 21–14goals 0–0

  2. Benning – Lagesson10:51

    xG 0.24–0.67 (26%)attempts 15–11goals 1–1

  3. Larsson – Jones16:26

    xG 0.59–1.10 (35%)attempts 15–23goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 1.7 xGMIN 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #305 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.65 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 82% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).