Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 25, 2020·Enterprise Center, St. Louis

Chicago Blackhawks 5, St. Louis Blues 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 79% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI210110210530
STL112111414637

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:33STLBrayden SchennPPAssists: Jaden Schwartz, David Perron · Snap, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:55CHIDuncan KeithPPAssists: Jonathan Toews · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:09CHIConnor MurphyAssists: Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:13CHIPatrick KanePPAssists: Duncan Keith, Dominik Kubalik · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P2 7:38STLRobert ThomasAssists: David Perron, Zachary Sanford · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P3 3:47STLRyan O'ReillyAssists: Brayden Schenn, Jaden Schwartz · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–3
  7. P3 4:03STLZachary SanfordAssists: Robert Thomas · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–4
  8. P3 5:16CHIMatthew HighmoreAssists: David Kampf, Alex Nylander · Wrist, 0.23 xG4–4
  9. P3 8:16CHIBrandon SaadPPAssists: Dylan Strome, Kirby Dach · Snap, 0.23 xG5–4
  10. P3 9:28STLJustin FaulkAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Alex Pietrangelo · Slap, 0.03 xG5–5
  11. P3 13:35STLZachary SanfordPPGWGAssists: Robert Thomas · Wrist, 0.14 xG5–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:11CHIConnor Murphy: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 3:25CHIMatthew Highmore: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 10:51STLMarco Scandella: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:28STLJordan Kyrou: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 17:05CHISlater Koekkoek: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 6:19STLColton Parayko: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 11:37CHIKirby Dach: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 17:09STLOskar Sundqvist: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
45% to win55% to win
← CHI attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sundqvist won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHISTL
30Shots on goal37
2.5Expected goals4.5
45Shot attempts59
32Faceoffs won30
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
11Hits14
11Blocked shots9
1Giveaways6
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – DeBrincat – Dach10:06

    xG 0.63–0.25 (71%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  2. Highmore – Nylander – Kampf7:36

    xG 0.45–0.49 (48%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

  3. Toews – Kubalik – Caggiula8:26

    xG 0.12–0.18 (41%)attempts 4–5goals 1–1

  4. Kane – Saad – Carpenter11:15

    xG 0.15–0.80 (16%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Boqvist5:32

    xG 0.27–0.11 (71%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  2. Keith – Koekkoek9:31

    xG 0.24–0.08 (74%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Maatta – Koekkoek3:06

    xG 0.17–0.07 (70%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Schenn – Schwartz12:05

    xG 0.73–0.19 (79%)attempts 12–6goals 2–0

  2. Perron – Sanford – Thomas11:48

    xG 0.51–0.32 (61%)attempts 12–9goals 2–1

  3. Steen – Sundqvist – Barbashev3:00

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Steen – Sundqvist – Kyrou5:35

    xG 0.20–0.20 (50%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Parayko14:53

    xG 0.35–0.05 (87%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Gunnarsson – Pietrangelo11:02

    xG 0.58–0.43 (57%)attempts 13–7goals 1–2

  3. Pietrangelo – Faulk3:26

    xG 0.21–0.06 (77%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 4.5 xGCHI 2.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #10 of 1082 this seasonSwing 3.09 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 79% of the time.

STL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).