Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 27, 2020·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit

Minnesota Wild 7, Detroit Red Wings 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 65% of the time.

DET winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN31031016726
DET0911007126

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:52MINRyan HartmanAssists: Mikko Koivu, Ryan Donato · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:19MINRyan DonatoGWGAssists: Ryan Hartman, Greg Pateryn · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–0
  3. P1 10:12MINMathew DumbaAssists: Kevin Fiala, Jonas Brodin · Slap, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 7:33DETAnthony ManthaUnassisted · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P2 10:30MINMathew DumbaAssists: Alex Galchenyuk, Mats Zuccarello · Slap, 0.05 xG4–1
  6. P2 12:05MINJordan GreenwayAssists: Joel Eriksson Ek, Zach Parise · Snap, 0.12 xG5–1
  7. P2 18:16MINKevin FialaAssists: Mikko Koivu · Backhand, 0.08 xG6–1
  8. P3 9:11MINEric StaalSHAssists: Kevin Fiala, Mathew Dumba · Slap, 0.14 xG7–1
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:10MINMikko Koivu: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 5:23DETBrendan Perlini: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 2:22DETDennis Cholowski: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 4:06MINKevin Fiala: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 9:00DETLuke Glendening: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 16:05MINMikko Koivu: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 17:13DETLuke Glendening: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DET
45% to win55% to win
← MIN attackDET attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Nielsen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINDET
26Shots on goal26
2.4Expected goals1.7
42Shot attempts61
30Faceoffs won32
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
11Hits17
15Blocked shots3
7Giveaways13
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Fiala – Mayhew8:05

    xG 0.69–0.25 (73%)attempts 11–8goals 2–0

  2. Koivu – Hartman – Donato9:13

    xG 0.61–0.38 (61%)attempts 8–15goals 2–0

  3. Parise – Greenway – Eriksson Ek10:47

    xG 0.39–0.31 (55%)attempts 4–11goals 1–0

  4. Foligno – Zuccarello – Galchenyuk10:43

    xG 0.33–0.33 (50%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba13:26

    xG 0.70–0.40 (63%)attempts 9–14goals 2–0

  2. Pateryn – Hunt12:44

    xG 0.45–0.48 (49%)attempts 12–19goals 0–1

  3. Suter – Spurgeon14:51

    xG 0.05–0.51 (10%)attempts 4–19goals 0–0

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestBertuzzi – Mantha – Larkin13:10

    xG 0.71–0.61 (54%)attempts 22–10goals 1–1

  2. Abdelkader – Glendening – Erne2:44

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Nielsen – Perlini – Ehn2:51

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Helm – Gagner8:48

    xG 0.14–0.14 (49%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBiega – Nemeth15:04

    xG 0.66–0.13 (84%)attempts 21–3goals 1–1

  2. Bowey – Hronek12:50

    xG 0.58–0.89 (40%)attempts 21–14goals 0–1

  3. Goloubef – Cholowski11:51

    xG 0.13–0.53 (20%)attempts 7–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DET 1.7 xGMIN 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DETMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #856 of 1082 this seasonSwing 0.71 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50DET 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 65% of the time.

DET winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (DET − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).