Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 4, 2020·Pepsi Center, Denver

Anaheim Ducks 4, Colorado Avalanche 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 79% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ANA2101501015430
COL213071807335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:51COLVladislav NamestnikovAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.32 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:34ANAAndrew AgozzinoAssists: Carter Rowney, Matt Irwin · Snap, 0.19 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:40ANABrendan GuhleAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Rickard Rakell · Snap, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P1 14:29COLGabriel LandeskogPPAssists: Samuel Girard, Tyson Jost · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:48ANASam SteelAssists: Ryan Getzlaf · Snap, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 7:19COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Tyson Jost · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:58ANARickard RakellGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 10:40ANANicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:40COLPierre-Edouard Bellemare: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 14:02ANAKiefer Sherwood: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P1 19:02ANAKiefer Sherwood: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 10:48COLGabriel Landeskog: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 4:13COLJoonas Donskoi: Holding2 min
  7. P3 6:41ANASonny Milano: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 9:38COLVladislav Namestnikov: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 9:38ANARyan Getzlaf: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 11:40COLMark Barberio: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 11:40ANAMax Jones: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
45% to win55% to win
← ANA attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Henrique won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACOL
30Shots on goal35
2.1Expected goals4.0
53Shot attempts73
23Faceoffs won34
2Power plays3
15Penalty minutes13
33Hits21
20Blocked shots15
2Giveaways1
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Deslauriers – Agozzino – Rowney6:53

    xG 0.02–0.04 (26%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Steel – Jones – Sherwood9:10

    xG 0.39–0.47 (45%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Henrique – Silfverberg – Rakell10:50

    xG 0.31–0.54 (37%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  4. Getzlaf – Milano – Heinen11:55

    xG 0.15–0.47 (24%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Djoos2:19

    xG 0.34–0.15 (69%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. Irwin – Larsson2:18

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Irwin – Djoos4:56

    xG 0.15–0.20 (42%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – Namestnikov – MacKinnon11:52

    xG 0.79–0.41 (66%)attempts 8–15goals 1–1

  2. Bellemare – Kamenev – O'Connor4:10

    xG 0.36–0.01 (98%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Donskoi – Nieto – Compher7:22

    xG 0.30–0.08 (78%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  4. Nichushkin – Jost – Kaut5:35

    xG 0.13–0.23 (36%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Cole11:15

    xG 0.65–0.06 (91%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Graves – Girard12:24

    xG 0.71–0.26 (73%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Girard4:01

    xG 0.37–0.04 (91%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 4.0 xGANA 2.1 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #290 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.93 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 79% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).