Thu, Mar 5, 2020·BB&T Center, Sunrise
Boston Bruins 2, Florida Panthers 1 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 66% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 012 | 15 | 07 | 14 | 228 |
| FLA | 04 | 115 | 012 | 02 | 133 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 6:55FLAMacKenzie WeegarAssists: Brett Connolly, Lucas Wallmark · Snap, 0.07 xG0–1
- P2 11:00BOSPatrice BergeronPPAssists: Torey Krug, Brad Marchand · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–1
- OT 4:08BOSTorey KrugGWGAssists: David Pastrnak, David Krejci · Slap, 0.06 xG2–1
Penalties (11)
- P1 11:41BOSOndrej Kase: Tripping2 min
- P1 14:35FLARiley Stillman: Fighting5 min
- P1 14:35BOSNick Ritchie: Fighting5 min
- P1 19:01FLAMike Matheson: Tripping2 min
- P2 10:46FLAEvgenii Dadonov: Elbowing2 min · PPG
- P2 11:48FLAAleksander Barkov: Tripping2 min
- P2 15:06BOSBrad Marchand: Hooking2 min
- P3 2:04FLAFrank Vatrano: Slashing2 min
- P3 2:58BOSCharlie Coyle: Tripping2 min
- P3 4:06FLAFrank Vatrano: Interference2 min
- P3 4:54BOSDavid Pastrnak: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Acciari won the faceoff against Bergeron
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- Bergeron – Marchand – Pastrnak9:41
xG 0.07–0.17 (30%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0
- Coyle – Wagner – DeBrusk9:23
xG 0.08–0.59 (11%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0
- Krejci – Ritchie – Kase8:35
xG 0.09–0.66 (11%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0
- Nordstrom – Kuraly – Bjork8:26
xG 0.12–1.16 (10%)attempts 3–12goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Krug – Lauzon2:51
xG 0.06–0.04 (59%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
- Grzelcyk – McAvoy2:22
xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
- Chara – Grzelcyk3:32
xG 0.12–0.28 (31%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
Florida Panthers
Forward lines
- bestHoffman – Haula – Vatrano9:03
xG 1.11–0.10 (92%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0
- Dadonov – Huberdeau – Barkov11:59
xG 0.81–0.23 (78%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0
- Connolly – Toninato – Wallmark6:37
xG 0.24–0.01 (97%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestYandle – Matheson11:13
xG 1.76–0.07 (96%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0
- Stralman – Stillman6:44
xG 0.40–0.06 (88%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0
- Weegar – Ekblad11:04
xG 0.19–0.03 (86%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 66% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (FLA − BOS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).