Fri, Mar 6, 2020·Little Caesars Arena, Detroit
Chicago Blackhawks 1, Detroit Red Wings 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 54% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 09 | 17 | 017 | 133 |
| DET | 09 | 211 | 05 | 225 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 0:20DETTyler BertuzziAssists: Dylan Larkin, Trevor Daley · Snap, 0.12 xG0–1
- P2 10:05DETRobby FabbriPPGWGAssists: Gustav Lindstrom, Frans Nielsen · Slap, 0.11 xG0–2
- P2 18:55CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Brandon Saad, Jonathan Toews · Snap, 0.11 xG1–2
Penalties (5)
- P1 8:35DETGustav Lindstrom: Holding2 min
- P1 11:35DETAnthony Mantha: Tripping2 min
- P1 17:37CHIConnor Murphy: Interference2 min
- P2 8:38CHIConnor Murphy: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P3 11:19DETAlex Biega: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Dach won the faceoff against Larkin
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestToews – Kane – Kubalik2:27
xG 0.33–0.04 (90%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0
- Toews – Kane – Saad4:35
xG 0.44–0.39 (53%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0
- Carpenter – Highmore – Kampf4:38
xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0
- DeBrincat – Caggiula – Dach10:08
xG 0.39–0.38 (51%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestKeith – Murphy6:08
xG 0.46–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0
- Keith – Gilbert9:43
xG 0.98–0.92 (52%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0
- Maatta – Koekkoek14:17
xG 0.23–0.37 (39%)attempts 7–13goals 0–1
Detroit Red Wings
Forward lines
- bestFilppula – Helm – Gagner6:51
xG 0.57–0.45 (56%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0
- Helm – Glendening – Fabbri3:00
xG 0.12–0.12 (52%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0
- Bertuzzi – Mantha – Larkin13:28
xG 0.67–0.79 (46%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1
- Nielsen – Abdelkader – Timashov4:10
xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestEricsson – Lindstrom6:04
xG 0.87–0.33 (72%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0
- Nemeth – Hronek3:17
xG 0.22–0.11 (68%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1
- Daley – Bowey2:04
xG 0.08–0.04 (65%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 54% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (DET − CHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).