Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 13, 2021·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Philadelphia Flyers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 57% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT11419111334
PHI2111739627

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:12PITMark JankowskiAssists: Brandon Tanev, Jared McCann · Snap, 0.71 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:11PHIJames van RiemsdykPPAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Joel Farabee · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:52PHINolan PatrickPPAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Joel Farabee · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:39PITSidney CrosbyPPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.29 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:54PHIJoel FarabeeAssists: Kevin Hayes · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:01PITBrandon TanevAssists: Mark Jankowski · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. P3 5:37PHIMichael RafflGWGAssists: Scott Laughton, Nicolas Aube-Kubel · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–4
  8. P3 12:14PHIOskar LindblomAssists: Travis Konecny, Sean Couturier · Backhand, 0.22 xG3–5
  9. P3 12:34PHIKevin HayesAssists: Joel Farabee, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:44PHIScott Laughton: Holding2 min
  2. P1 13:47PITCody Ceci: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P1 19:44PITMike Matheson: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 1:52PHIJakub Voracek: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 7:23PHINolan Patrick: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 0:39PITJared McCann: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITPHI
34Shots on goal27
2.7Expected goals2.4
54Shot attempts46
21Faceoffs won29
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
23Hits31
11Blocked shots13
10Giveaways10
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestJankowski – McCann – Tanev9:28

    xG 1.07–0.39 (73%)attempts 12–2goals 2–1

  2. Sceviour – Blueger – Lafferty9:56

    xG 0.32–0.32 (50%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

  3. Crosby – Guentzel – Rodrigues13:35

    xG 0.38–0.62 (38%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

  4. Malkin – Zucker – Rust12:15

    xG 0.39–0.68 (36%)attempts 11–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMatheson – Marino13:08

    xG 0.97–0.41 (70%)attempts 13–8goals 1–2

  2. Ceci – Pettersson12:18

    xG 0.73–0.59 (55%)attempts 16–9goals 1–1

  3. Letang – Dumoulin17:52

    xG 0.28–0.63 (31%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Hayes – Farabee11:21

    xG 1.24–0.34 (78%)attempts 16–9goals 2–0

  2. Couturier – Lindblom – Konecny12:02

    xG 0.46–0.39 (54%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0

  3. Laughton – Raffl – Aube-Kubel9:44

    xG 0.19–0.35 (36%)attempts 2–9goals 1–0

  4. van Riemsdyk – Voracek – Patrick11:24

    xG 0.16–0.95 (14%)attempts 4–11goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGustafsson – Hagg12:33

    xG 0.60–0.28 (68%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  2. Sanheim – Myers16:12

    xG 1.01–0.80 (56%)attempts 18–20goals 1–0

  3. Braun – Provorov14:10

    xG 0.20–1.03 (17%)attempts 5–14goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.4 xGPIT 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #150 of 868 this seasonSwing 1.89 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 35% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 57% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).